IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complex Parameter Landscape for a Complex Neuron Model

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Achard
  • Erik De Schutter

Abstract

The electrical activity of a neuron is strongly dependent on the ionic channels present in its membrane. Modifying the maximal conductances from these channels can have a dramatic impact on neuron behavior. But the effect of such modifications can also be cancelled out by compensatory mechanisms among different channels. We used an evolution strategy with a fitness function based on phase-plane analysis to obtain 20 very different computational models of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. All these models produced very similar outputs to current injections, including tiny details of the complex firing pattern. These models were not completely isolated in the parameter space, but neither did they belong to a large continuum of good models that would exist if weak compensations between channels were sufficient. The parameter landscape of good models can best be described as a set of loosely connected hyperplanes. Our method is efficient in finding good models in this complex landscape. Unraveling the landscape is an important step towards the understanding of functional homeostasis of neurons.Synopsis: Neurons are believed to be electrical information processors. But how many models of a neuron can have similar input/output behavior? How precisely must the model parameters be tuned? These questions are crucial for models of the cerebellar Purkinje cell, a neuron with a huge dendritic arborization and a complex range of electrical outputs, for which recent experiments have demonstrated that dissimilar sets of ionic channel densities can produce similar activities. The authors have therefore used a detailed model of a Purkinje cell, released its 24 channel density parameters, and let them be optimized through an evolution strategy algorithm. They obtained 20 sets of parameters (20 models) that reproduce very precisely the original electrical waveforms. Therefore, model parameters are not uniquely identifiable. The parameters obtained vary several fold whereas small variations of these can also lead to drastically different results. Therefore, the authors have examined in more details the parameter space to gain better understanding of compensatory mechanisms in such complex models. They demonstrate that the 20 models are neither completely isolated nor fully connected, but rather, they belong to thin hyperplanes of good solutions that grid searches or random searches are likely to miss.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Achard & Erik De Schutter, 2006. "Complex Parameter Landscape for a Complex Neuron Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020094
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020094
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020094&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willemijn Groenendaal & Francis A Ortega & Armen R Kherlopian & Andrew C Zygmunt & Trine Krogh-Madsen & David J Christini, 2015. "Cell-Specific Cardiac Electrophysiology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Dimitrios V Vavoulis & Volko A Straub & John A D Aston & Jianfeng Feng, 2012. "A Self-Organizing State-Space-Model Approach for Parameter Estimation in Hodgkin-Huxley-Type Models of Single Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-1, March.
    3. Shaul Druckmann & Thomas K Berger & Felix Schürmann & Sean Hill & Henry Markram & Idan Segev, 2011. "Effective Stimuli for Constructing Reliable Neuron Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Xu, Ying & Guo, Yeye & Ren, Guodong & Ma, Jun, 2020. "Dynamics and stochastic resonance in a thermosensitive neuron," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    5. Timothy Rumbell & James Kozloski, 2019. "Dimensions of control for subthreshold oscillations and spontaneous firing in dopamine neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, September.
    6. Amrita X Sarkar & Eric A Sobie, 2010. "Regression Analysis for Constraining Free Parameters in Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Matthew Plumlee & V. Roshan Joseph & Hui Yang, 2016. "Calibrating Functional Parameters in the Ion Channel Models of Cardiac Cells," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 500-509, April.
    8. Quentin J M Huys & Liam Paninski, 2009. "Smoothing of, and Parameter Estimation from, Noisy Biophysical Recordings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Mustafa Baz & Brady Hunsaker & Oleg Prokopyev, 2011. "How much do we “pay” for using default parameters?," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 91-108, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.