IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!

Author

Listed:
  • Lonni Besançon
  • Elisabeth Bik
  • James Heathers
  • Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the limitations of the current scientific publication system, in which serious post-publication concerns are often addressed too slowly to be effective. In this Perspective, we offer suggestions to improve academia’s willingness and ability to correct errors in an appropriate time frame.Four scientists who have identified issues in published papers struggled to get them amended or retracted; here they present evidence that these struggles are widely shared and that scientific advances are presently critically hindered. They make suggestions for academic actors that would help scientists raise concerns about submissions and improve academia’s correction rate and speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lonni Besançon & Elisabeth Bik & James Heathers & Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, 2022. "Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-4, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001572
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001572
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001572&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewen Callaway & Heidi Ledford & Giuliana Viglione & Traci Watson & Alexandra Witze, 2020. "COVID and 2020: An extraordinary year for science," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7839), pages 550-552, December.
    2. Heidi Ledford & Richard Van Noorden, 2020. "High-profile coronavirus retractions raise concerns about data oversight," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7811), pages 160-160, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Benson Marshall & Stephen Pinfield & Pamela Abbott & Andrew Cox & Juan Pablo Alperin & Germana Fernandes Barata & Natascha Chtena & Isabelle Dorsch & Alice Fleerackers & Monique Oliveira & Isa, 2024. "The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: a qualitative analysis of published materials from the period of the pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Grimes, David Robert, 2022. "The Ellipse of Insignificance: a refined fragility index for ascertaining robustness of results in dichotomous outcome trials," OSF Preprints 32p8t, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tam-Tri Le & Viet-Phuong La & Huyen Thanh Thanh Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Quy Khuc & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2022. "Covid-19 vaccines production and societal immunization under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management theory and conceptual framework," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Maria Lucia Specchia & Andrea Di Pilla & Martina Sapienza & Maria Teresa Riccardi & Americo Cicchetti & Gianfranco Damiani & Instant Report Group, 2021. "Dealing with COVID-19 Epidemic in Italy: Responses from Regional Organizational Models during the First Phase of the Epidemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Massimo Riccaboni & Luca Verginer, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific research in the life sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Annie Collins & Rohan Alexander, 2022. "Reproducibility of COVID-19 pre-prints," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4655-4673, August.
    5. Gaoyong Li & Xin Zhang & Ge Zhang, 2022. "How the 5G Enabled the COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention and Control: Materiality, Affordance, and (De-)Spatialization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Trenton Taros & Christopher Zoppo & Nathan Yee & Jack Hanna & Christine MacGinnis, 2023. "Retracted Covid-19 articles: significantly more cited than other articles within their journal of origin," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2935-2943, May.
    7. Bernd W. Wirtz & Jan C. Weyerer & Marcel Becker & Wilhelm M. Müller, 2022. "Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2381-2404, December.
    8. Tirthankar Ghosal & Sandeep Kumar & Prabhat Kumar Bharti & Asif Ekbal, 2022. "Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.