IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1001392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radar Tracking and Motion-Sensitive Cameras on Flowers Reveal the Development of Pollinator Multi-Destination Routes over Large Spatial Scales

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Lihoreau
  • Nigel E Raine
  • Andrew M Reynolds
  • Ralph J Stelzer
  • Ka S Lim
  • Alan D Smith
  • Juliet L Osborne
  • Lars Chittka

Abstract

Automated tracking of bumblebees and computer simulations reveal how bees locate a series of flowers and optimize their routes to visit them all. Central place foragers, such as pollinating bees, typically develop circuits (traplines) to visit multiple foraging sites in a manner that minimizes overall travel distance. Despite being taxonomically widespread, these routing behaviours remain poorly understood due to the difficulty of tracking the foraging history of animals in the wild. Here we examine how bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) develop and optimise traplines over large spatial scales by setting up an array of five artificial flowers arranged in a regular pentagon (50 m side length) and fitted with motion-sensitive video cameras to determine the sequence of visitation. Stable traplines that linked together all the flowers in an optimal sequence were typically established after a bee made 26 foraging bouts, during which time only about 20 of the 120 possible routes were tried. Radar tracking of selected flights revealed a dramatic decrease by 80% (ca. 1500 m) of the total travel distance between the first and the last foraging bout. When a flower was removed and replaced by a more distant one, bees engaged in localised search flights, a strategy that can facilitate the discovery of a new flower and its integration into a novel optimal trapline. Based on these observations, we developed and tested an iterative improvement heuristic to capture how bees could learn and refine their routes each time a shorter route is found. Our findings suggest that complex dynamic routing problems can be solved by small-brained animals using simple learning heuristics, without the need for a cognitive map. Author Summary: Many food resources, such as flowers refilling with nectar or fruits ripening on a tree, replenish over time, so animals that depend on them need to develop strategies to reduce the energy they use during foraging. Here we placed five artificial flowers in a field and set out to examine how bumblebees optimize their foraging routes between distant locations. We tracked the flight paths of individual bees with harmonic radar and recorded all their visits to flowers with motion-sensitive video cameras. This dataset allowed us to study how bees gradually discover flowers, learn their exact position in the landscape, and then find the shortest route to collect nectar from each flower in turn. Using computer simulations, we show that the level of optimisation performance shown by bees can be replicated by a simple learning algorithm that could be implemented in a bee brain. We postulate that this mechanism allows bumblebees to optimise their foraging routes in more complex natural conditions, where the number and productivity of flowers vary.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Lihoreau & Nigel E Raine & Andrew M Reynolds & Ralph J Stelzer & Ka S Lim & Alan D Smith & Juliet L Osborne & Lars Chittka, 2012. "Radar Tracking and Motion-Sensitive Cameras on Flowers Reveal the Development of Pollinator Multi-Destination Routes over Large Spatial Scales," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001392
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazuharu Ohashi & James D. Thomson & Daniel D'Souza, 2007. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: IV. Optimization of route geometry in the absence of competition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. A. Dornhaus & L. Chittka, 1999. "Evolutionary origins of bee dances," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6748), pages 38-38, September.
    3. J. R. Riley & U. Greggers & A. D. Smith & D. R. Reynolds & R. Menzel, 2005. "The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7039), pages 205-207, May.
    4. Audrey E. Cramer & C. R. Gallistel, 1997. "Vervet monkeys as travelling salesmen," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6632), pages 464-464, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Capera-Aragones, Pau & Foxall, Eric & Tyson, Rebecca C., 2022. "Nutritionally rich wildflower patches adjacent to nutritionally deficient crops significantly increase pollination services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Wario & Benjamin Wild & Raúl Rojas & Tim Landgraf, 2017. "Automatic detection and decoding of honey bee waggle dances," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Becher, M.A. & Grimm, V. & Knapp, J. & Horn, J. & Twiston-Davies, G. & Osborne, J.L., 2016. "BEESCOUT: A model of bee scouting behaviour and a software tool for characterizing nectar/pollen landscapes for BEEHAVE," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 126-133.
    3. Kazuharu Ohashi & Alison Leslie & James D. Thomson, 2013. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: VII. Adjustments for foraging success following competitor removal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 768-778.
    4. Richard J Bomphrey & Simon M Walker & Graham K Taylor, 2009. "The Typical Flight Performance of Blowflies: Measuring the Normal Performance Envelope of Calliphora vicina Using a Novel Corner-Cube Arena," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-10, November.
    5. Tomoko Sakiyama & Ikuo Arizono, 2017. "Can the Agent with Limited Information Solve Travelling Salesman Problem?," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-6, April.
    6. Annie Lang & Rachel L. Bailey & Sean Ryan Connolly, 2015. "Encoding Systems and Evolved Message Processing: Pictures Enable Action, Words Enable Thinking," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-43.
    7. Zhang, Zhihui & Jing, Rui & Lin, Jian & Wang, Xiaonan & van Dam, Koen H. & Wang, Meng & Meng, Chao & Xie, Shan & Zhao, Yingru, 2020. "Combining agent-based residential demand modeling with design optimization for integrated energy systems planning and operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Chudzinska, Magda & Dupont, Yoko L. & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Maia, Kate P. & Henriksen, Marie V. & Rasmussen, Claus & Kissling, W. Daniel & Hagen, Melanie & Trøjelsgaard, Kristian, 2020. "Combining the strengths of agent-based modelling and network statistics to understand animal movement and interactions with resources: example from within-patch foraging decisions of bumblebees," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    9. Kazuharu Ohashi & James D. Thomson, 2013. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: VI. Behavioral alterations under speed–accuracy trade-offs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 182-189.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.