IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i3p768-778..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trapline foraging by bumble bees: VII. Adjustments for foraging success following competitor removal

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuharu Ohashi
  • Alison Leslie
  • James D. Thomson

Abstract

Animals collecting food from renewable resource patches scattered in space often establish small foraging areas to which they return faithfully. Such area fidelity offers foraging advantages through selection of profitable patches, route minimization, and regular circuit visits to these patches ("trapline foraging"). Resource distribution under field conditions may often vary in time, however, especially when competitors suddenly vanish and a number of patches become available for their neighbors. Previous studies suggested that site-faithful foragers of bumble bees quickly respond to such unexpected events by readjusting their foraging areas, although it is not clear how much their foraging performance was improved, beyond the simple relaxation of competitive pressure, or how they manifest such flexibility while persistently using certain foraging areas or paths. Here, we conducted indoor flight-cage experiments with bumble bees and found that a bee, when encountering a loss of its competitor, improved its foraging performance to a greater extent than expected from a simple relaxation of competitive pressure by increasing the size of its foraging area. Moreover, bees with better-established traplines achieved greater foraging areas after the loss of competitors, suggesting that bees do not necessarily need to "sample" neighboring patches to monitor temporal changes in environments. We discuss how periodical returns and route memory associated with accurate reward values could allow inherently conservative trapliners to make flexible adjustments, by effectively monitoring their circumstances and quickly readjusting to detected changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuharu Ohashi & Alison Leslie & James D. Thomson, 2013. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: VII. Adjustments for foraging success following competitor removal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 768-778.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:768-778.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars200
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazuharu Ohashi & James D. Thomson & Daniel D'Souza, 2007. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: IV. Optimization of route geometry in the absence of competition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Kazuharu Ohashi & James D. Thomson, 2005. "Efficient harvesting of renewing resources," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 592-605, May.
    3. James G. Burns & James D. Thomson, 2006. "A test of spatial memory and movement patterns of bumblebees at multiple spatial and temporal scales," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(1), pages 48-55, January.
    4. Kazuharu Ohashi & Alison Leslie & James D. Thomson, 2008. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: V. Effects of experience and priority on competitive performance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 936-948.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazuharu Ohashi & James D. Thomson, 2013. "Trapline foraging by bumble bees: VI. Behavioral alterations under speed–accuracy trade-offs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 182-189.
    2. Mathieu Lihoreau & Nigel E Raine & Andrew M Reynolds & Ralph J Stelzer & Ka S Lim & Alan D Smith & Juliet L Osborne & Lars Chittka, 2012. "Radar Tracking and Motion-Sensitive Cameras on Flowers Reveal the Development of Pollinator Multi-Destination Routes over Large Spatial Scales," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Noam Bar-Shai & Tamar Keasar & Avi Shmida, 2010. "The Use of Numerical Information by Bees in Foraging Tasks," Discussion Paper Series dp555, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    4. Carla J. Essenberg & Rebekah A. Easter & Rachel A. Simmons & Daniel R. Papaj, 2015. "The value of information in floral cues: bumblebee learning of floral size cues," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1335-1344.
    5. Chudzinska, Magda & Dupont, Yoko L. & Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob & Maia, Kate P. & Henriksen, Marie V. & Rasmussen, Claus & Kissling, W. Daniel & Hagen, Melanie & Trøjelsgaard, Kristian, 2020. "Combining the strengths of agent-based modelling and network statistics to understand animal movement and interactions with resources: example from within-patch foraging decisions of bumblebees," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    6. Vergara, Pablo M. & Saura, Santiago & Pérez-Hernández, Christian G. & Soto, Gerardo E., 2015. "Hierarchical spatial decisions in fragmented landscapes: Modeling the foraging movements of woodpeckers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 114-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:768-778.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.