IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/0020001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science on the Rise in Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Milena Holmgren
  • Stefan A Schnitzer

Abstract

The disparity in the scientific output between developed and developing counties is dramatic, but, as the Americas show, this grim picture is improving.

Suggested Citation

  • Milena Holmgren & Stefan A Schnitzer, 2004. "Science on the Rise in Developing Countries," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(1), pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0020001
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020001&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. B. Vohora & Divya Vohora, 2001. "Why are Indian journals' impact factors so low?," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6847), pages 583-583, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles J. Gomez & Andrew C. Herman & Paolo Parigi, 2022. "Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 919-929, July.
    2. José Miguel Aguilera & Felipe Larraín, 2021. "Natural laboratories in emerging countries and comparative advantages in science: Evidence from Chile," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 732-753, November.
    3. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Scientific Output and GDP: Evidence from Countries around the World," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 2(2), pages 38-41.
    4. Lemarchand, Guillermo A., 2012. "The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 291-305.
    5. I. Jarić & J. Gessner, 2012. "Analysis of publications on sturgeon research between 1996 and 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 715-735, February.
    6. Ricardo B. Duque & Wesley M. Shrum & Omar Barriga & Guillermo Henríquez, 2009. "Internet practice and professional networks in Chilean science: Dependency or progress?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 239-263, October.
    7. João Carlos Nabout & Micael Rosa Parreira & Fabrício Barreto Teresa & Fernanda Melo Carneiro & Hélida Ferreira Cunha & Luciana Souza Ondei & Samantha Salomão Caramori & Thannya Nascimento Soares, 2015. "Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 357-364, January.
    8. Ricardo B. Sampaio & Bruna P. F. Fonseca & Ashwin Bahulkar & Boleslaw K. Szymanski, 2017. "Network analysis to support public health: evolution of collaboration among leishmaniasis researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 2001-2021, June.
    9. Leonardo M. R. Ferreira & Giovanni A. Carosso & Natalia Montellano Duran & Soad V. Bohorquez-Massud & Gustavo Vaca-Diez & Laura Ines Rivera-Betancourt & Yara Rodriguez & Dalila G. Ordonez & Diana K. A, 2019. "Effective participatory science education in a diverse Latin American population," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Harley, Diane & Acord, Sophia Krzys, 2011. "Peer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt1xv148c8, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    11. Basuchoudhary, Atin & Reksulak, Michael, 2007. "Losing The Edge At The Final Frontier: A Relative Decline In Scientific Inputs And Its Consequences," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 7(2), pages 23-36.
    12. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Scientific Output: Evidence from Iran and the Middle East," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 2(4), pages 138-142.
    13. Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & María Fernanda Reyes & Marta Telesnicki & Ignacio Agramonte & Marcos H. Easdale & María Fe Schmitz & Martín Aguiar & Antonio Gómez-Sal & Carlos Mon, 2018. "What do We Talk about When We Talk about Social-Ecological Systems? A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Anderson Matos Medina, 2018. "Why do ecologists search for co-authorships? Patterns of co-authorship networks in ecology (1977–2016)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1853-1865, September.
    15. V. M. Stefenon & L. F. W. Roesch & A. B. Pereira, 2013. "Thirty years of Brazilian research in Antarctica: ups, downs and perspectives," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 325-331, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo B. Duque & Wesley M. Shrum & Omar Barriga & Guillermo Henríquez, 2009. "Internet practice and professional networks in Chilean science: Dependency or progress?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 239-263, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0020001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.