IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/josres/v3y2016i3p81-94id2789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Different Scoring Systems on Upset Percentage and Match Length in Tennis: A Simulation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Harris

Abstract

Tennis has used many different scoring systems throughout its history. Researchers have been examining these scoring systems for over forty years. While several intuitive themes have emerged, no systematic examination on how different scoring systems affect the stronger player’s probability of winning over a range of serving strengths has been done. This research study used simulation to examine the three most common scoring systems used in the United States and their effect on match win probability, total points played, and expected length of the match. Moving from ad to no ad or 10-point scoring can result in a more than 3.5% and 5% respective decrease in the probability of the stronger player winning a match. When applied to NCAA Division I team tennis, moving from ad to no ad can decrease the stronger team’s probability of winning by over 4%. Changes between scoring systems are more pronounced at relatively weaker serving strengths.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Harris, 2016. "The Effects of Different Scoring Systems on Upset Percentage and Match Length in Tennis: A Simulation Study," Journal of Sports Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(3), pages 81-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:pkp:josres:v:3:y:2016:i:3:p:81-94:id:2789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/90/article/view/2789/4353
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christophe Ley & Yves Dominicy, 2017. "Mutual Point-winning Probabilities (MPW): a New Performance Measure for Table Tennis," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2017-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:josres:v:3:y:2016:i:3:p:81-94:id:2789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/90/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.