Author
Listed:
- Achirou Souley Ousmane
- Halima Oumarou Diadie
- Issoufou Amadou
- Abdourahamane Balla
Abstract
Camel meat, a food with high nutritional value, is still subject to socio-cultural considerations within certain Nigerien communities. Thus, this study of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding the consumption of this meat was carried out to rule out these socio-cultural considerations. To do this, a sample of 236 households, distributed according to the weight of urban households, was the subject of a cross-sectional survey in three (3) large cities in Niger (Niamey, Tahoua, and Agadez). The results reveal that camel meat is not highly appreciated for its organoleptic quality and certain beliefs and customary taboos. Indeed, this meat is perceived by pregnant Nigerien women (71.9%) as a food that “prolongs the pregnancy by one year.” Additionally, knowledge and attitudes towards camel meat are based on its perception. However, two categories of consumers have been identified: occasional and regular. These two categories of consumers perceive camel meat in their diet differently. Thus, 43% of consumers attribute nutritional and therapeutic virtues to camel meat, while 32.6% of consumers consider that camel meat is similar to other red meats. Furthermore, 3.3% of consumers advocate the Islamic benefits of camel meat to justify its consumption. However, it was noted that 14.1% of consumers reject camel meat because they are not accustomed to it, and 7% of consumers reject camel meat due to its poor organoleptic quality. Thus, the perceptions observed by consumers about camel meat are much more cultural than real. In short, this study can contribute to changing social behavior towards camel meat.
Suggested Citation
Achirou Souley Ousmane & Halima Oumarou Diadie & Issoufou Amadou & Abdourahamane Balla, 2025.
"Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of populations regarding the consumption of camel meat in the Sahel of Niger,"
Journal of Food Technology Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 12(1), pages 11-24.
Handle:
RePEc:pkp:joftre:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:11-24:id:4149
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:joftre:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:11-24:id:4149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/58/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.