IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v61y2022i2p153-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Framework and Behavioural Issues in the Informal Khokhas’ Markets in Pakistan (Article)

Author

Listed:
  • Anwar Shah

    (Associate Professor, School of Economics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.)

  • Tehseen Ahmed Qureshi

    (Senior Research Analyst, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Pakistan.)

Abstract

Khokha (Kiosk) is a major part of informal markets and is widely observed across the globe and in Pakistan. Khokhas are one of the major sources of market-based poverty alleviation and absorb a significant number of labour force. However, on average Khokhas in Pakistan are in shabby states, which arise a question about its regulatory framework. Whether any regulatory framework of Khokhas prevails in Pakistan and to what extent it facilitates or hinders entry. To find an answer to these questions, we collect data from secondary and primary sources and find that, there exists no legal framework to obtain a license for establishing Khokhas in Pakistan. People set up a Khokha with a constant fear of demolishment, fines, confiscation, and arrest. We also find that the harassment of current vendors from public authorities is a major behavioural barrier for prospective entrants. Based on the other countries’ best practices, we propose a detailed set of policies for creating a formal legal framework for khokhas across Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Anwar Shah & Tehseen Ahmed Qureshi, 2022. "Regulatory Framework and Behavioural Issues in the Informal Khokhas’ Markets in Pakistan (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 153-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:61:y:2022:i:2:p:153-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pide.org.pk/pdfpdr/2022/153-168.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Schaumans & Frank Verboven, 2015. "Entry and Competition in Differentiated Products Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(1), pages 195-209, March.
    2. Syed Turab Hussain & Usman Khan & Kashif Zaheer Malik & Adeel Faheem, 2012. "Constraints Faced by Industry in Punjab, Pakistan," Working Papers id:5090, eSocialSciences.
    3. Bloom, David E & Canning, David & Sevilla, Jaypee, 2003. "Geography and Poverty Traps," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 355-378, December.
    4. You, Jong-Il, 1995. "Small Firms in Economic Theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(3), pages 441-462, June.
    5. Barrett, Christopher B., 2008. "Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 299-317, August.
    6. Annemarie M. F. Hiemstra & Koen G. Van der kooy & Michael Frese, 2006. "Entrepreneurship in the Street Food Sector of Vietnam—Assessment of Psychological Success and Failure Factors," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 474-481, July.
    7. Idrees Khawaja & Nasir Iqbal, 2019. "Determinants of Expansion of Micro and Small Firms and State of Entrepreneurship in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2019:160, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    8. Williams, Colin C. & Shahid, Muhammad S. & Martínez, Alvaro, 2016. "Determinants of the Level of Informality of Informal Micro-Enterprises: Some Evidence from the City of Lahore, Pakistan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 312-325.
    9. Barbier, Edward B., 2010. "Poverty, development, and environment," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(6), pages 635-660, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hochard, Jacob & Barbier, Edward, 2017. "Market Accessibility and Economic Growth: Insights from a New Dimension of Inequality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 279-297.
    2. Barbier, Edward B., 2020. "Long run agricultural land expansion, booms and busts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Edward B. Barbier & Ramón E. López & Jacob P. Hochard, 2016. "Debt, Poverty and Resource Management in a Rural Smallholder Economy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(2), pages 411-427, February.
    4. Barbier, Edward B., 2012. "Natural capital, ecological scarcity and rural poverty," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6232, The World Bank.
    5. Edward B. Barbier & Jacob P. Hochard, 2019. "Poverty-Environment Traps," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(3), pages 1239-1271, November.
    6. Christos Karydas & Evangelos V. Dioikitopoulos, 2020. "Sustainability traps: patience and innovation," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 20/330, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    7. Barbier, Edward B., 2013. "Structural change, dualism and economic development : the role of the vulnerable poor on marginal lands," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6456, The World Bank.
    8. Tabe-Ojong, M.P.J. & Mausch, K. & Woldeyohanes, T. & Heckelei, T., 2018. "A Triple-Hurdle Model of the Impacts of Improved Chickpea Adoption on Smallholder Production and Commercialization in Ethiopia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277287, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Antoci, Angelo & Galdi, Giulio & Russu, Paolo, 2022. "Environmental degradation and comparative advantage reversal," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    10. Ogada, Maurice Juma, 2012. "Forest Management Decentralization in Kenya: Effects on Household Farm Forestry Decisions in Kakamega," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126319, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Davide Fiaschi & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Angela Parenti, 2020. "Deep and Proximate Determinants of the World Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(3), pages 677-710, September.
    12. Steven N. Durlauf & Andros Kourtellos & Chih Ming Tan, 2008. "Empirics of Growth and Development," Chapters, in: Amitava Krishna Dutt & Jaime Ros (ed.), International Handbook of Development Economics, Volumes 1 & 2, volume 0, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Zhang, Xiaobei & Wang, Xiaojun, 2021. "Measures of human capital and the mechanics of economic growth," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Lavopa, Alejandro & Szirmai, Adam, 2018. "Structural modernisation and development traps. An empirical approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 59-73.
    15. Richard S. J. Tol, 2021. "The Economic Impact of Climate in the Long Run," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Anil Markandya & Dirk Rübbelke (ed.), CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT, chapter 1, pages 3-36, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    16. Fujimoto, Takefumi & Suzuki, Aya, 2021. "Do Fertilizer and Seed Subsidies Strengthen Farmers' Market Participation? the Impact of Tanzania NAIVS on Farmers' Purchase of Agricultural Inputs and Their Maize-Selling Activities," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315044, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Nalan Basturk & Richard Paap & Dick van Dijk, 2008. "Structural Differences in Economic Growth," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-085/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. Ryan Nehring & Ana Carla Miranda & Andrew Howe, 2017. "A case for institutional demand as effective social protection: supporting smallholders through procurement and food assistance programmes," Working Papers 157, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    19. Olson, Kent, 2013. "Trends, issues, threats, and opportunities affecting farmers," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 52(4), August.
    20. Muriithi, Beatrice W. & Matz, Julia Anna, 2015. "Welfare effects of vegetable commercialization: Evidence from smallholder producers in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 80-91.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Khokhas; Barriers to Entry; Informal Markets; Legal Framework;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D52 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Incomplete Markets
    • J46 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Informal Labor Market
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:61:y:2022:i:2:p:153-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.