IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v38y1999i4p699-716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Poverty and Credit Use: Evidence from Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sohail Jehangir Malik

    (The World Bank, Washington, D. C. and Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.)

  • Hina Nazli

    (The World Bank, Washington, D. C. and Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.)

Abstract

The 1990s have seen poverty reduction become the overarching objective of all economic development. In countries where poverty is largely a rural phenomenon it is obvious that considerations of poverty focus on improving rural welfare. The welfare impact of credit use in the process of agricultural development is generally not explicitly documented in the literature.1 The emphasis is generally on “the requisites for development of rural financial policies that facilitate rural growth” [Desai and Mellor (1993)]. Welfare gains arise from this growth through net gains in income from the relaxation of the capital constraint leading to higher input use and resultant higher output, in addition to increasing the risk bearing capacity of households thus leading to the adoption of new technology and diversification of crop mix and income sources. Additionally welfare gains can also arise from credit use directly through improved and more efficient consumption smoothing. Pakistan is predominantly rural and poor. Attempts over several decades, by successive governments, at developing the institutional credit market in Pakistan have failed miserably. The rural credit market continues to be fragmented and beset by distortions. Credit policy aimed at improving access of the small landowners and the poor ended up being diverted to the powerful large landowners. This misuse is widely documented in Malik (1989, 1990 and 1999). Badly designed policies coupled with a weak institutional structure and rampant corruption called into question the very basis for using credit markets as a means for poverty alleviation. This paper, therefore, attempts to evaluate the underlying relationship between rural poverty and credit use.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohail Jehangir Malik & Hina Nazli, 1999. "Rural Poverty and Credit Use: Evidence from Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 699-716.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:38:y:1999:i:4:p:699-716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1999/Volume4/699-716.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desai, Bhupat M. & Mellor, John W., 1993. "Institutional finance for agricultural development," Food policy reviews 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Sohail J. Malik & Mohammad Mushtaq & Manzoor Ahmed Gill, 1989. "Differential Access and the Rural Credit Market in Pakistan: Some Recent Evidence," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 28(4), pages 709-716.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noor Muhammad Jamali & Rizwana Chang, 2007. "Poverty Alleviation A Critical Analysis Of Causes & Remedies 2001-2005," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 3(1), pages 22-34.
    2. Abid Hussain & Gopal Bahadur Thapa, 2016. "Fungibility of Smallholder Agricultural Credit: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(5), pages 826-846, November.
    3. Nawaz AHMAD, 2011. "Impact of Institutional Credit on Agricultural Output: A Case Study of Pakistan," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(10(563)), pages 99-120, October.
    4. Salmiah & Thomson Sebayang & Muhammad Khaliqi & Iskandar Muda, 2019. "Farmer Preference to Access Agricultural Credit in Indonesia," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 5(2), pages 16-23, November.
    5. Noor Muhammad Jamali & Rizwana Chang, 2007. "Poverty Alleviation A Critical Analysis Of Causes & Remedies 2001-2005," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 3(1), pages 3-3.
    6. Ta Nhat Linh & Hoang Thanh Long & Le Van Chi & Le Thanh Tam & Philippe Lebailly, 2019. "Access to Rural Credit Markets in Developing Countries, the Case of Vietnam: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Abdul Rehman & Zakia Batool & Hengyun Ma & Rafael Alvarado & Judit Oláh, 2024. "Climate change and food security in South Asia: the importance of renewable energy and agricultural credit," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bime, Mary-Juliet & Mbanasor, Jude Anayochukwu, 2011. "Analysis of rural credit market performance in north west region, Cameroon," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 3(3), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Ranjula Bali Swain, 2007. "The demand and supply of credit for households," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(21), pages 2681-2692.
    3. Burmeister, Larry & Ranis, Gustav & Wang, Michael, 2001. "Group Behavior and Development: A Comparison of Farmers' Organisations in South Korea and Taiwan," Center Discussion Papers 28464, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    4. Petrick, Martin & Latruffe, Laure, 2003. "Credit access and borrowing costs in Poland's agricultural credit market: a hedonic pricing approach," IAMO Discussion Papers 46, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    5. Shehla Amjad & SAF Hasnu, 2007. "Smallholders’ Access to Rural Credit: Evidence from Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, Jul-Dec.
    6. Odulaja, Adedapo & Kiros, Fassil G., 1996. "Modelling agricultural production of small-scale farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: A case study in western Kenya," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 85-91, July.
    7. Jabbar, M. A. & Ehui, S. K. & Von Kaufmann, R., 2002. "Supply and Demand for Livestock Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons for Designing New Credit Schemes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1029-1042, June.
    8. Nawaz AHMAD, 2011. "Impact of Institutional Credit on Agricultural Output: A Case Study of Pakistan," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(10(563)), pages 99-120, October.
    9. Abdul Salam, 2012. "Review of Input and Output Policies for Cereals Production in Pakistan," Working Papers id:5176, eSocialSciences.
    10. Musleh-Ud Din & Ejaz Ghani & Sarfraz K. Qureshi, 1996. "Scale and Scope Economies in Banking: A Case Study of the Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 203-213.
    11. Farhad Zulfiqar & Raza Ullah & Muhammad Abid & Abid Hussain, 2016. "Cotton production under risk: a simultaneous adoption of risk coping tools," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(2), pages 959-974, November.
    12. Bose, Sukanya, 2004. "Financial Liberalization and the Agrarian Sector: India and Kenya Compared," MPRA Paper 28509, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Mellor, John W., 2014. "High rural population density Africa – What are the growth requirements and who participates?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 66-75.
    14. Ng'ombe, John & Kalinda, Thomson, 2015. "A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Maize Production Under Minimum Tillage in Zambia," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2).
    15. Paul Mosley, 2002. "The African green revolution as a pro-poor policy instrument," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 695-724.
    16. Olomola, Aderbigbe & Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena, 2014. "Loan demand and rationing among small-scale farmers in Nigeria:," IFPRI discussion papers 1403, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Larry Burmeister & Gustav Ranis & Michael Wang, 2001. "Group Behavior and Development: A Comparison of Farmers' Organisations in South Korea and Taiwan," Working Papers 828, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    18. Sharma, Manohar & Zeller, Manfred, 1997. "Repayment performance in group-based credit programs in Bangladesh: An empirical analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1731-1742, October.
    19. Edgar E. Twine & Elizaphan J. O. Rao & Isabelle Baltenweck & Amos O. Omore, 2019. "Are Technology Adoption and Collective Action Important in Accessing Credit? Evidence from Milk Producers in Tanzania," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(3), pages 388-412, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:38:y:1999:i:4:p:699-716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.