IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v9y2018i3p545-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of methodological and psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire of congruence of personal and organizational values

Author

Listed:
  • Jolita Vveinhardt

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

  • Evelina Gulbovaite

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

Abstract

Research background: Congruence of employees’ personal and organizational values means that the employee both accepts and cherishes organizational values, as well as follows them in daily activities of the organization. Different forms of values in the organization are derived from three subjects (employees, managers, and the organization as a whole). From this perspective, value congruence occurs when employees’ personal values match the organizational values, which are supported by the top management of the organization and are acceptable to the majority of members of the organization. Purpose of the article: To carry out verification of methodological and psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire of congruence of personal and organizational values. Methods: The survey of employees was carried out in 15 organizations, of which 11 are private and 4 belong to the public sector (N=374), and on the basis of the results of the research statistical and psychometric analysis of the data was performed. By developing the instrument of congruence of personal and organizational values, an analytical reflection method was applied. To conduct the empirical study, the mixed methods approach was employed, consistently combining qualitative and quantitative research methods, substantiating the research results with different data sources and forms. An expert assessment method was chosen for identification of validity of the constructed instrument and suitability of its content. To identify the perceived congruence of personal and organizational values, employees’ personal values, the values prevailing in the organization and the climate of the organization, employees’ attitudes towards work and organizational performance results, the employees’ questionnaire surveys in fifteen organizations were conducted. The sample was formed employing the stratified sampling methodology. To identify the reliability of methodological and psychometric characteristics of the constructed questionnaire, factor distribution, Cronbach alpha and Spearman Brown coefficients, factor weights, resolutions of test steps were calculated and explained. Multivariate statistical methods: correlation and factor analysis, etc. were also applied. Findings & value added: The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were empirically proved and it is recommended that scholars researching values in organizations and value congruence should use the Questionnaire of Congruence of Personal and Organizational Values for Employees with the authors’ consent.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolita Vveinhardt & Evelina Gulbovaite, 2018. "Reliability of methodological and psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire of congruence of personal and organizational values," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(3), pages 545-571, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:9:y:2018:i:3:p:545-571
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2018.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2018.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nelson S. Lubguban, Jr. & Vincent S. Verano & Koiser S. Sarazain & Alvin O. Cayogyog, 2024. "The Mediating Effect of Leadership Practices on the Relationship between Organizational Values and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 1799-1810, March.
    2. Natalija Sedziuviene & Jolita Vveinhardt, 2018. "The Reactions of Post-Soviet Countries Employees to Changes Carried Out by Organizations in Higher Education: Cases of Lithuanian, Ukrainian and Belarusian State Colleges," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 225-235.
    3. Fahd Zulfiqar & Saman Nazir & Fizzah Khalid Butt & Henna Ahsan, 2023. "Building Community & Networks," PIDE Research Report 2023:14, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    4. Maureen Gelle-Jimenez & Hector M. Aguiling, 2021. "Leveraging human resources management (HRM) practices toward congruence of values," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(1), pages 85-94, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    congruence of personal and organizational values; questionnaire of value congruence; validity and reliability of the questionnaire;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:9:y:2018:i:3:p:545-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.