IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v10y2019i1p37-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the post-crisis EU banking network connectedness in the global context

Author

Listed:
  • Renata Legenzova

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

  • Asta Gaigaliene

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

  • Otilija Jurakovaite

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

Abstract

Research background: The global banking network has been undergoing structural changes since the recent financial crisis. Previous studies on connectedness of global banking network during post-crisis period revealed the trends of regionalization and segmentation. Our previous research has also shown that during post-crisis period the level of regionalization within the EU banking network has increased; the network became more clustered and more decentralized. This paper continues our research of structural changes of EU banking network during post-crisis period by adding a global context and questioning the connectedness of EU banking network within global banking system. Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to evaluate the EU banking network’s connectedness in the global context during the post-crisis period. Methods: network analysis method and data on yearly flows of BIS bilateral interbank cross-border claim were used to evaluate the connectedness of global and EU banking systems. Findings & Value added: Evaluation of the global banking network’s connected-ness revealed that global banking network density decreased by 4.50 %, suggesting that connectedness is decreasing, but it is happening slowly. Structural changes in the global banking network did happen during post-crisis period with regards to out-degree, betweenness and closeness centrality indicators. In the global context, the EU banking network became more connected during post-crisis period. The EU banking network was regionalized in 2011, but this regionalization disappeared in 2015, as the level of intraregional density decreased in 2015 and became lower than the interregional density. This research contributes to previous research in a way that it applies intraregional and interregional network density measures for evaluation of the EU banking network’s connectedness, and analyses it as a subset of the global banking network.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata Legenzova & Asta Gaigaliene & Otilija Jurakovaite, 2019. "Evaluation of the post-crisis EU banking network connectedness in the global context," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 37-53, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:37-53
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2019.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2019.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikhail Stolbov & Daniil Parfenov, 2023. "Credit risk linkages in the international banking network, 2000–2019," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 1-38, September.
    2. Artur F. Tomeczek & Tomasz M. Napiórkowski, 2024. "PageRank and Regression as a Two-Step Approach to Analysing a Network of Nasdaq Firms During a Recession: Insights from Minimum Spanning Tree Topology," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 56-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    network analysis; financial connectedness; regionalization; EU banking network; global banking network;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:37-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.