Surrogate Worth Trade Off Method’S Review, Applications And Extension
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Chowdhury, Mashrur & Tan, Pulin, 2004. "A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Framework for Transportation Investments," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 43(1).
- Debeljak, C. J. & Haimes, Y. Y. & Leach, M., 1986. "Integration of the surrogate worth trade-off method and the analytic hierarchy process," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 375-385.
- Romuald Szopa & Bogdan Marczyk, 2011. "Optimization Of Production Problems Using Mathematical Programming," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 4(1), pages 1-238, September.
- Sakawa, Masatoshi, 1982. "Interactive multiobjective decision making by the sequential proxy optimization technique: SPOT," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 386-396, April.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
- Roman Olejnik, 2015. "Stability And Quality Map Of Toyota Technological Processes And Its Computer-Aided Marketing Analysis," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(2), pages 122-129, December.
- E Zio & F Di Maio & S Martorell, 2008. "Fusion of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms for multi-objective system reliability design optimization," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 115-126, June.
- Mariano Luque & Rafael Caballero & Julian Molina & Francisco Ruiz, 2007. "Equivalent Information for Multiobjective Interactive Procedures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 125-134, January.
- Kaliszewski, Ignacy, 2004. "Out of the mist--towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 293-307, October.
- Miettinen, Kaisa & Makela, Marko M. & Kaario, Katja, 2006. "Experiments with classification-based scalarizing functions in interactive multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 931-947, December.
- Rafael Lazimy, 2013. "Interactive Polyhedral Outer Approximation (IPOA) strategy for general multiobjective optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 73-99, November.
- Yang, Chyan & Liu, Hsian-Ming, 2012. "Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: A network DEA," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 450-461.
- Caballero, Rafael & Ruiz, Francisco & Uria, M. Victoria Rodriguez & Romero, Carlos, 2006. "Interactive meta-goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 135-154, November.
- J. Cabello & M. Luque & F. Miguel & A. Ruiz & F. Ruiz, 2014. "A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain)," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 109-127, April.
- M. K. Pandey & M. K. Tiwari & M. J. Zuo, 2007. "Interactive enhanced particle swarm optimization: A multi-objective reliability application," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(3), pages 177-191, September.
- Francisco Ruiz & Mariano Luque & Kaisa Miettinen, 2012. "Improving the computational efficiency in a global formulation (GLIDE) for interactive multiobjective optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 47-70, August.
- Bowen, William M., 1995. "A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 151-163, June.
More about this item
Keywords
family enterprise; cluster; innovation;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:99-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Bajdor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzpczpl.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.