IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01306-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and reliability of a questionnaire developed to explore quality assurance components for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education

Author

Listed:
  • Satumari John Wafudu

    (Adamawa State College of Education)

  • Yusri Bin Kamin

    (Universiti Teknologi)

  • Daniel Marcel

    (Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University of Technology)

Abstract

Most vocational and technical education (VTE) educational systems invest in quality assurance for teaching and learning to improve the skills of the workforce that would contribute to socio-economic development. Quality assurance provides confidence in educational services to meet the quality desires of teaching and learning settings. Yet it has been reported that there are challenges in teaching and learning effectiveness due to a lack of technological breakthroughs among students, resulting in an insufficiently skilled workforce. The primary aim of this study is to develop and validate a questionnaire for quality assurance for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education. The questionnaire was developed based on the data obtained by item generation through an interview with quality managers, administrators, and lecturers and a literature review. The content validity of the quality assurance for teaching and learning (QATL) questionnaire was validated using expert judgment. The principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal varimax techniques examined the structures and validity of the quality components. After exploratory factor analysis on the quality components under input, process, and output domains, the input quality factors explained 78.81% of the cumulative variance, the process quality factors explained 72.679% of the cumulative variance, and the output quality factors explained 75.027% of the cumulative variance. The analysis used Cronbach’s alpha to test the internal consistency reliability, and the alpha values ranged from 0.835 to 0.963, indicating very high reliability. Present findings suggest that the QATL is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing quality components of quality assurance for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education. These quality components enable optimal VTE objective achievement if implemented in teaching and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Satumari John Wafudu & Yusri Bin Kamin & Daniel Marcel, 2022. "Validity and reliability of a questionnaire developed to explore quality assurance components for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01306-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01306-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01306-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01306-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Zelt & Jan Recker & Theresa Schmiedel & Jan vom Brocke, 2018. "Development and validation of an instrument to measure and manage organizational process variety," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Said, Alison, 2018. "Vocational teaching-learning through the eyes of undergraduate vocational students in Malta: A qualitative exploratory study," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 5(1), pages 42-63.
    3. Elizabeth Garira, 2020. "A Proposed Unified Conceptual Framework for Quality of Education in Schools," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    4. Adeolu Joshua AYENI, 2017. "Teachers’ Classroom management and Quality Assurance of Students’ Learning Outcome in Secondary Schools in Ondo State, Nigeria," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 166-180, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carissa Tibia Walidayni & Dina Dellyana & Evy Rachmawati Chaldun, 2023. "Towards SDGs 4 and 8: How Value Co-Creation Affecting Entrepreneurship Education’s Quality and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Yuhang Han & Yi Zhou & Sarah Carr & Jiaoyan Jiang, 2024. "Lifelong learning in the workplace: the knowledge management role of corporate universities in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davison Machisa & Constance Gutuza & Tichaona Mapolisa, 2023. "Challenges and Mitigations on Quality Education in Emerging Private High Schools: A Case of Mabelreign/Warren Park District, Harare of Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(8), pages 970-980, August.
    2. Bilegjargal Ganbold & Kyungbo Park & Jongyi Hong, 2022. "Study of Educational Service Quality in Mongolian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Xanthe Hunt & Ashrita Saran & Howard White & Hannah Kuper, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of interventions for improving educational outcomes for people with disabilities in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    4. Lin, Jie & Wang, Chao & Zhou, Lixin & Jiang, Xiaoyan, 2022. "Converting consumer-generated content into an innovation resource: A user ideas processing framework in online user innovation communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01306-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.