IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v4y2018i1d10.1057_s41599-018-0118-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on human regeneration

Author

Listed:
  • James F. Stark

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

Regeneration is a concept that has fascinated humans for centuries. Whether we have been trying to bring things back to life, extract additional resources from the world, or remodel our living spaces—domestic and urban—it is often presented as an unproblematic force for good. But what exactly does it mean to regenerate a body, mind or space? This paper, which introduces a collection of contributions on the theme of human regeneration, explores the limits and possibilities of regeneration as a conceptual tool for understanding the biological realm. What does it mean to be regenerated? How can a scholarly focus on this concept enrich our histories of bodies, ageing, disability and science, technology and medicine? As a secondary goal, I identify two distinct aspects of regeneration—'hard' and 'soft' regeneration—which concern the medical and social elements of regeneration respectively. By recognising that everything from cosmetics and fictions to prosthetics and organs grown in vitro display a combination of 'hard' and 'soft' elements, we are better placed to understand that the biological and social must be considered in consort for us to fully appreciate the meanings and practices that underpin multiple forms of human regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • James F. Stark, 2018. "Perspectives on human regeneration," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:4:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-018-0118-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0118-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-018-0118-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-018-0118-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Oakley, 2018. "Sexual rejuvenation and hegemonic masculinity in C.P. Snow’s suppressed novel New Lives for Old (1933)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Jennifer Edwards & Richard Thomas & Robert Guilliatt, 2017. "Regenerative medicine: from the laboratory looking out," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Jessica P. Clark, 2017. "“Clever ministrations”: regenerative beauty at the fin de siècle," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Cheryl A. Logan, 2017. "Psychoneurosis beyond Oedipus: neurophysiology, drive conflict, and the resolution of emotional trauma," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Gardner, John & Webster, Andrew, 2016. "The social management of biomedical novelty: Facilitating translation in regenerative medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 90-97.
    6. Chris Gilleard, 2017. "Regeneration, restoration and resurrection: scholastic inquiries into the nature of bodily growth and decay," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pat Thane, 2018. "What is ‘regeneration’ and who needs it?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, December.
    2. Alberto Bezama & Carlo Ingrao & Sinéad O’Keeffe & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Erik Aarden & Luca Marelli & Alessandro Blasimme, 2021. "The translational lag narrative in policy discourse in the United States and the European Union: a comparative study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Hogarth, Stuart & Löblová, Olga, 2022. "Regulatory niches: Diagnostic reform as a process of fragmented expansion. Evidence from the UK 1990–2018," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Gardner, John & Higham, Ruchi & Faulkner, Alex & Webster, Andrew, 2017. "Promissory identities: Sociotechnical representations & innovation in regenerative medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 70-78.
    6. Neil Stephens & Imtiaz Khan & Rachel Errington, 2018. "Analysing the role of virtualisation and visualisation on interdisciplinary knowledge exchange in stem cell research processes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Massaro, Sebastiano & Lorenzoni, Gianni, 2021. "Nanomedicine: a socio-technical system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:4:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-018-0118-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.