IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03576-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of counselors’ values and religious beliefs on their role identity and perspectives on heritable genome editing: a qualitative interview study

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy P. Geuverink

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute)

  • Janneke T. Gitsels

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
    InHolland
    University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen)

  • Martina C. Cornel

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute)

  • Bert Jan Lietaert Peerbolte

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Christina Prinds

    (University Hospital of Southern Denmark
    University of Southern Denmark)

  • Carla G. El

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute)

  • Linda Martin

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
    InHolland
    University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen)

Abstract

The implementation of the noninvasive prenatal test has shown the importance of involving future care providers in healthcare innovations at an early stage. Therefore, in this explorative study in-depth interviews were performed with Dutch midwife counselors who explicitly identify as religious, to explore how they currently deal with their worldview during counseling for prenatal anomaly screening and regarding their perspectives on heritable genome editing (HGE). HGE is a potentially disruptive technology in which a pregnancy is initiated with a modified embryo or gamete, thus passing on modified genes to a future child and the following generations. Currently, a significant majority of countries prohibit HGE. However, implications for healthcare policy and practice are discussed in an ongoing scientific and societal dialogue. Eleven counselors participated: eight Christians and three Muslims. Two main themes were identified: ‘a search for role identity as a healthcare counselor’ and ‘concerns about the application of HGE’. Our findings showed that both values and underlying worldview-based beliefs influence perspectives on current and emerging reproductive techniques. Healthcare counselors search for ways to harmonize their professional role with contrasting values based on worldview-based beliefs. Moreover, for HGE, counselors fear ‘slippery slopes’ regarding the boundaries between treatment and enhancement, the severity assessment of certain conditions, and society’s appreciation for the quality of life of people with disabilities. Regarding future implementation, counselors’ medical education might benefit from a focus not only on qualification (acquiring knowledge) but also on balancing between socialization (e.g., adhering the norm of nondirective counseling) and subjectification (being a ‘self’ in relation to everything learned). In the global call for broad public and stakeholder engagement to explore the acceptability of HGE, the influence of both values and beliefs should be deliberated.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy P. Geuverink & Janneke T. Gitsels & Martina C. Cornel & Bert Jan Lietaert Peerbolte & Christina Prinds & Carla G. El & Linda Martin, 2024. "The impact of counselors’ values and religious beliefs on their role identity and perspectives on heritable genome editing: a qualitative interview study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03576-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03576-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03576-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03576-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mara Almeida & Robert Ranisch, 2022. "Beyond safety: mapping the ethical debate on heritable genome editing interventions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Michael Morrison & Stevienna de Saille, 2019. "CRISPR in context: towards a socially responsible debate on embryo editing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendy Geuverink & Carla El & Martina Cornel & Bert Jan Lietaert Peerbolte & Janneke Gitsels & Linda Martin, 2023. "Between desire and fear: a qualitative interview study exploring the perspectives of carriers of a genetic condition on human genome editing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Melanie Goisauf & Kaya Akyüz & Gillian M. Martin, 2020. "Moving back to the future of big data-driven research: reflecting on the social in genomics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03576-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.