IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03452-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Novel insights from financial analysis of the failure to commercialise plazomicin: Implications for the antibiotic investment ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Nadya Wells

    (University of Geneva)

  • Vinh-Kim Nguyen

    (Geneva Graduate Institute)

  • Stephan Harbarth

    (WHO Collaborating Center)

Abstract

The need for novel antibiotics to combat emerging multi-drug resistant bacterial strains is widely acknowledged. The development of new therapeutic agents relies on small and medium-sized biotechnology enterprises (SMEs), representing 75% of the late-stage pipeline. However, most SME sponsors of an antibacterial approved by the FDA since 2010 have gone bankrupt, or exited at a loss, below investment cost. Uncovering financial flows related to the development and commercialisation of a single drug is complex and typically untransparent. There is therefore a lack of empirical research on the financial vulnerabilities of these critical SMEs. The development of plazomicin by Achaogen (2004–2019) entailed financial disclosures as a public company enabling application of financial analysis methods to: determine quantum and timing of public and private investments; quantify development costs; and provide a deeper understanding of the role of capital market dependency in exacerbating pipeline fragility. Achaogen’s widely cited bankruptcy, and plazomicin’s commercialisation failure, created a perception that novel antibiotics have zero market value, causing investors to question the SME developer business model. Our analysis of Achaogen’s inability to fund commercialisation suggests three key implications for the antibiotic investment ecosystem: (1) novel antibiotics with narrow approval for small patient populations affected by severe resistant infections cannot be successfully commercialised in the current US antibiotic market; (2) SMEs need incentive payments structured to enable them to survive the commercialisation cashflow drought, and (3) these changes are necessary to restore industry and financial investor confidence in the antibiotic SME development model. Achaogen’s demise demonstrates that proposals to incentivise innovation, e.g. by providing one-off payments at registration, may be insufficient to ensure access to novel antibiotics developed by SMEs. In plazomicin’s case, moreover, US government biosecurity investments have not resulted in access, as the Indian and Chinese companies which bought post-bankruptcy rights have not widely commercialised the drug. This study is timely as new market-based incentives are currently being proposed by the US, EU, Canada and Japan. In order to make further government funding effective, ensuring access, not only innovation, these must support sustainable financial models for the SMEs critical to novel antibiotic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadya Wells & Vinh-Kim Nguyen & Stephan Harbarth, 2024. "Novel insights from financial analysis of the failure to commercialise plazomicin: Implications for the antibiotic investment ecosystem," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03452-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03452-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03452-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03452-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glover, Rebecca & Singer, Andrew & Roberts, Adam & Kirchhelle, Claas, 2021. "NIMble innovation - a networked model for public antibiotic trials," SocArXiv vp8mj, Center for Open Science.
    2. Andersson, Tord & Gleadle, Pauline & Haslam, Colin & Tsitsianis, Nick, 2010. "Bio-pharma: A financialized business model," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 631-641.
    3. Benjamin Plackett, 2020. "Why big pharma has abandoned antibiotics," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7830), pages 50-52, October.
    4. Lazonick, William & Tulum, Öner, 2011. "US biopharmaceutical finance and the sustainability of the biotech business model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1170-1187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel Rabinovich & Niall Reddy, 2024. "Corporate Financialization: A Conceptual Clarification and Critical Review of the Literature," Working Papers PKWP2402, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    2. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Williams-Jones, B. & Denis, J.-L. & Longo, C., 2014. "How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1025-1038.
    3. Ener, Hakan, 2022. "How does CEO technical expertise influence licensing-out at technology ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Sven Wydra & Timo Leimbach, 2015. "Integration von Industrie- und Innovationspolitik: Beispiele aus den USA und Israel und Ansätze der neuen EU-Industriepolitik," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 84(1), pages 121-134.
    6. Lehoux, P. & Miller, F.A. & Daudelin, G., 2017. "Converting clinical risks into economic value: The role of expectations and institutions in health technology development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 206-216.
    7. Lazonick, William & Mazzucato, Mariana & Tulum, Öner, 2013. "Apple's changing business model: What should the world's richest company do with all those profits?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 249-267.
    8. Camille Loir & Bertrand Groslambert, 2023. "The impact of innovation on the profitability of the biotech industry," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(3), pages 1286-1297.
    9. Giovanni Dosi & Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2016. "Financial regimes, financialization patterns and industrial performances : preliminary remarks," Post-Print halshs-01418040, HAL.
    10. Dang, Jianwei & Motohashi, Kazuyuki & Huo, Dong, 2022. "Get Pennies from many or get a Dollar from one? Multiple licensing in markets for technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    11. Mazzucato, Mariana & Semieniuk, Gregor, 2018. "Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 8-22.
    12. Licht, Georg & Crass, Dirk & Eckert, Thomas & Sellenthin, Mark O. & Pfirrmann, Oliver & Heinrich, Stephan & Strohmeyer, Robert & Tonoyan, Vartuhi & Woywode, Michael, 2012. "Ex-post-Evaluierung der Fördermaßnahmen BioChance und BioChancePlus im Rahmen der Systemevaluierung "KMU-innovativ": Begleit- und Wirkungsforschung zur Hightech-Strategie," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 110559, June.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/401t6job098n79ch91o9giov9d is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Arisa Djurian & Tomohiro Makino & Yeongjoo Lim & Shintaro Sengoku & Kota Kodama, 2020. "Trends of Business-to-Business Transactions to Develop Innovative Cancer Drugs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Olga Bruyaka & Hanko Zeitzmann & Isabelle Chalamon & Richard Wokutch & Pooja Thakur, 2013. "Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Orphan Drug Development: Insights from the US and the EU Biopharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 45-65, September.
    17. Mariana Mazzucato, 2015. "From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Economic Policy," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-25, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    18. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2014. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-26.
    19. Margit Kirs & Veiko Lember & Erkki Karo, 2021. "Technology transfer in economic periphery: Emerging patterns and policy challenges," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 677-706, November.
    20. Philippe Gorry & Diego Useche, 2018. "Orphan Drug Designations as Valuable Intangible Assets for IPO Investors in Pharma-Biotech Companies," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Dimensions of Personalized and Precision Medicine, pages 305-334, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Kalle Pajunen & Joonas Järvinen, 2018. "To survive or succeed? An analysis of biotechnology firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 757-771, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03452-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.