IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02132-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sport–gender stereotypes and their impact on impression evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyuan Liu

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Menglu Shentu

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Yuhan Xue

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Yike Yin

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Zhihao Wang

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Liangchen Tang

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Yu Zhang

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

  • Weiqi Zheng

    (Beijing Sport University
    Laboratory of Sports Stress and Adaptation of General Administration of Sport)

Abstract

Sports have traditionally had gendered connotations in society and culture, resulting in solidified gender stereotypes that influence impression evaluations. China has a special gender social culture; however, how sport–gender stereotypes (SGS) influence the gender evaluation of people in China in the Global South is still unknown. This study obtained gender-typed sports and attribute adjectives and proved the existence of SGS through a pilot study (392 college students, n1 = 207, n2 = 185) and then used two studies to explore the influence of both explicit and implicit SGS on evaluations and compared the differences between these stereotypes and general gender stereotypes. Study 1 (395 college students, n1a = 192, n1b = 203) examined the explicit level using a questionnaire experiment. The results of two experiments showed that (1) stereotype-consistent targets were more masculine or feminine in correspondence with their gender, while stereotype-inconsistent targets had higher anti-gender traits; and (2) the inclusion of stereotype-consistent sports activities led targets to be evaluated as more masculine, while stereotype-inconsistent sport activities showed gender evaluation reversal, especially for women. Study 2 (103 college students, n2a = 61, n2b = 42) measured the implicit attitudes using the Implicit Association Test. The results of two experiments showed that (1) implicit evaluations of stereotype-consistent targets were associated faster than stereotype-inconsistent targets and (2) the inclusion of gender-typed sports weakened implicit gender evaluations. In conclusion, this is the first quantitative study to explore the unique effect of SGS on individual evaluations and how they differ from general gender stereotypes in the Chinese context. These findings could provide valuable insights for research and the application of sports social science and physical education.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyuan Liu & Menglu Shentu & Yuhan Xue & Yike Yin & Zhihao Wang & Liangchen Tang & Yu Zhang & Weiqi Zheng, 2023. "Sport–gender stereotypes and their impact on impression evaluations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02132-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02132-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02132-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02132-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:pal:palcom:v:2016:y:2016:i:palcomms20163:p:16003- is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Merryn McKinnon & Christine O’Connell, 2020. "Perceptions of stereotypes applied to women who publicly communicate their STEM work," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Gabriela Ortiz-Martínez & Patricia Vázquez-Villegas & María Ileana Ruiz-Cantisani & Mónica Delgado-Fabián & Danna A. Conejo-Márquez & Jorge Membrillo-Hernández, 2023. "Analysis of the retention of women in higher education STEM programs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Ian Wellard, 2016. "Gendered performances in sport: an embodied approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Muhammad Junaid Haris & Aanchal Upreti & Melih Kurtaran & Filip Ginter & Sebastien Lafond & Sepinoud Azimi, 2023. "Identifying gender bias in blockbuster movies through the lens of machine learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Isabelle Régner & Catherine Thinus-Blanc & Agnès Netter & Toni Schmader & Pascal Huguet, 2019. "Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(11), pages 1171-1179, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lúcia Gomes & João Martins & Madalena Ramos & Francisco Carreiro da Costa, 2023. "The Impact of Non-Physical Education Teachers’ Perceptions on the Promotion of Active and Healthy Lifestyles: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Ryo Takahashi, 2022. "Gender differences in tolerance for women's opinions and the role of social norms," Working Papers 2123, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    3. Anna Lupon & Pablo Rodríguez-Lozano & Mireia Bartrons & Alba Anadon-Rosell & Meritxell Batalla & Susana Bernal & Andrea G Bravo & Pol Capdevila & Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles & Núria Catalán & Ana Genua-Ol, 2021. "Towards women-inclusive ecology: Representation, behavior, and perception of women at an international conference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. José García-Montalvo & Daniele Alimonti & Sonja Reiland & Isabelle Vernos, 2020. "Gender Stereotype and the Scientific Career of Women: Evidence from Biomedical Research Centers," Working Papers 1212, Barcelona School of Economics.
    5. Sun, Zhuanlan & Clark Cao, C. & Ma, Chao & Li, Yiwei, 2023. "The academic status of reviewers predicts their language use," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    6. Anna Grzelec, 2024. "Doing gender equality and undoing gender inequality—A practice theory perspective," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 749-767, May.
    7. Kahori Ishibashi & Ryo Takahashi, 2024. "Too“hot”to recognize her rights: The impact of climate change on attitude toward gender equality," Working Papers 2310, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    8. L. Elisa Celis & Amit Kumar & Nisheeth K. Vishnoi & Andrew Xu, 2024. "Centralized Selection with Preferences in the Presence of Biases," Papers 2409.04897, arXiv.org.
    9. Nisvan Erkal & Lata Gangadharan & Boon Han Koh, 2021. "Gender Biases in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Beliefs Versus Outcomes," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2021-09, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    10. Steven Kayambazinthu Msosa & Bhekabantu Alson Ntshangase & Courage Mlambo, 2022. "Gender parity among researchers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 243-261, June.
    11. Emre Özel, 2024. "What is Gender Bias in Grant Peer review?," Working Papers halshs-03862027, HAL.
    12. Merryn McKinnon & Christine O’Connell, 2020. "Perceptions of stereotypes applied to women who publicly communicate their STEM work," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Abramo, Giovanni & Aksnes, Dag W. & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2021. "Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    14. Onochie Fan-Osuala, 2023. "Women’s online opinions are still not as influential as those of their male peers in buying decisions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Ramani, Ravi S. & Aguinis, Herman & Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline A.M., 2022. "Defining, measuring, and rewarding scholarly impact: mind the level of analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117286, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Founou, Luria Leslie & Yamba, Kaunda & Kouamou, Vinie & Asare Yeboah, Esther Eyram & Saidy, Binta & Jawara, Lalia A. & Bah, Haddy & Sambe Ba, Bissoume & Aworh, Mabel Kamweli & Darboe, Saffiatou, 2023. "African women in science and development, bridging the gender gap," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    17. Jaber ABDALLAH & Siham JIBAI, 2020. "Women In Leadership: Gender Personality Traits And Skills," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 5-15, March.
    18. Fernanda Staniscuaski & Arthur V. Machado & Rossana C. Soletti & Fernanda Reichert & Eugenia Zandonà & Pamela B. Mello-Carpes & Camila Infanger & Zelia M. C. Ludwig & Leticia Oliveira, 2023. "Bias against parents in science hits women harder," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. José Garcia Montalvo & Daniele Alimonti & Sonja Reiland & Isabelle Vernos, 2020. "Gender stereotype and the scientific career of women: Evidence from biomedical research genters," Economics Working Papers 1750, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    20. Hannah B. Love & Alyssa Stephens & Bailey K. Fosdick & Elizabeth Tofany & Ellen R. Fisher, 2022. "The impact of gender diversity on scientific research teams: a need to broaden and accelerate future research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02132-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.