IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v23y2021i4d10.1057_s41278-021-00187-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the quality of ship arrival predictions

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Veenstra

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Rogier Harmelink

    (University of Twente)

Abstract

The arrival of a ship at a port is a complex process. It has been reported that ships in port can spend 5–10% of their time in unnecessary anchorage. Predicting the accurate time of ship arrivals could support port actors to optimally allocate their resources and reduce this time, to the benefit of port competitiveness. Currently, the rise of real-time automated ship identification data has given ports, shipping lines and other actors the possibility to predict but also to follow the consecutive steps a ship undertakes while entering a port. Much work has been done on the development of advanced estimated time of arrival (ETA) predictors, but little is known about the quality of ETA information that shipping lines provide to ports. We explore, quantitatively, the predictive power of the sequences of ETAs that ships transmit to the Port of Antwerp while arriving. We propose several forecast evaluation measures to assess the quality of a sequence of predictions and their ability to converge to the actual time of arrival. For the Port of Antwerp, we compute and interpret the measures on a dataset of port calls in the year 2019. Our aim is to compare ETA prediction quality across ships. Understanding variations in prediction quality gives port authorities a basis for discussion with individual shipowners, enabling them to improve their predictions and thus contribute to the competitive performance of the port. As an innovation, we cluster the different berths in our data set with the OPTICS algorithm to gain a better understanding of the effects of the river locks a ship must transit on her way to the allocated berth. Our findings indicate that, on average, shipping lines offer poor and optimistic arrival estimates, which they gradually adjust. The adjustments increase as the ship approaches the port and sometimes they overcompensate earlier predictions. In this, we find little evidence that shipping lines are adopting the advanced arrival prediction methods that have been developed in recent years. Our proposed prediction evaluation measures open the door for a uniform and quantitative approach to assessing the quality of prediction sequences of ships entering ports, to the benefit of a miscellany of port actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Veenstra & Rogier Harmelink, 2021. "On the quality of ship arrival predictions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 655-673, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1057_s41278-021-00187-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41278-021-00187-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-021-00187-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41278-021-00187-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianfranco Fancello & Claudia Pani & Marco Pisano & Patrizia Serra & Paola Zuddas & Paolo Fadda, 2011. "Prediction of arrival times and human resources allocation for container terminal," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(2), pages 142-173, June.
    2. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo & Marsillac, Erika, 2014. "Port service chains and port performance evaluation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 236-247.
    3. Chao Chen & Jamie Twycross & Jonathan M Garibaldi, 2017. "A new accuracy measure based on bounded relative error for time series forecasting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Hamed Hasheminia & Changmin Jiang, 2017. "Strategic trade-off between vessel delay and schedule recovery: an empirical analysis of container liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 458-473, May.
    5. Makridakis, Spyros, 1993. "Accuracy measures: theoretical and practical concerns," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 527-529, December.
    6. Wang, Zhengyi & Liang, Man & Delahaye, Daniel, 2020. "Automated data-driven prediction on aircraft Estimated Time of Arrival," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Andreas Balster & Ole Hansen & Hanno Friedrich & André Ludwig, 2020. "An ETA Prediction Model for Intermodal Transport Networks Based on Machine Learning," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(5), pages 403-416, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albert W. Veenstra & Rogier L. A. Harmelink, 2022. "Process mining ship arrivals in port: the case of the Port of Antwerp," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 584-601, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2020. "The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 54-74.
    2. Alysha M De Livera, 2010. "Automatic forecasting with a modified exponential smoothing state space framework," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 10/10, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    3. Lawrence, Michael & O'Connor, Marcus, 2000. "Sales forecasting updates: how good are they in practice?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 369-382.
    4. Yanfeng Liu & Miao Su & Jinjing Zhao & Sally Martin & Kum Fai Yuen & Choong-Bae Lee, 2023. "The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment: a vector error correction model analysis of coastal and landlocked countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 29-56, February.
    5. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2016. "Port multi-service congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 66-70.
    6. Blaskowitz, Oliver & Herwartz, Helmut, 2011. "On economic evaluation of directional forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1058-1065, October.
    7. En-Chih Chang, 2018. "Improving Performance for Full-Bridge Inverter of Wind Energy Conversion System Using a Fast and Efficient Control Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    9. Maria Tzitiridou-Chatzopoulou & Georgia Zournatzidou & Michael Kourakos, 2024. "Predicting Future Birth Rates with the Use of an Adaptive Machine Learning Algorithm: A Forecasting Experiment for Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Dean W. Wichern & Benito E. Flores, 2005. "Evaluating forecasts: a look at aggregate bias and accuracy measures," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 433-451.
    11. Bruce G. S. Hardie & Peter S. Fader & Robert Zeithammer, 2003. "Forecasting new product trial in a controlled test market environment," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 391-410.
    12. Willams B. F. da Silva & Pedro M. Almeida‐Junior & Abraão D. C. Nascimento, 2023. "Generalized gamma ARMA process for synthetic aperture radar amplitude and intensity data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), November.
    13. Yoon, Sung Wook & Jeong, Suk Jae, 2015. "An alternative methodology for planning baggage carousel capacity expansion: A case study of Incheon International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 63-74.
    14. Jose, Victor Richmond R. & Winkler, Robert L., 2008. "Simple robust averages of forecasts: Some empirical results," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 163-169.
    15. Saidi, Samir & Mani, Venkatesh & Mefteh, Haifa & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Akhtar, Pervaiz, 2020. "Dynamic linkages between transport, logistics, foreign direct Investment, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 277-293.
    16. Zhengwei Huang & Jin Huang & Jintao Min, 2022. "SSA-LSTM: Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Prediction Based on Feature Matching," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Kim, Sungil & Kim, Heeyoung, 2016. "A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 669-679.
    18. Goodwin, Paul & Lawton, Richard, 1999. "On the asymmetry of the symmetric MAPE," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 405-408, October.
    19. Ngoc-Lan Huynh, Anh & Deo, Ravinesh C. & Ali, Mumtaz & Abdulla, Shahab & Raj, Nawin, 2021. "Novel short-term solar radiation hybrid model: Long short-term memory network integrated with robust local mean decomposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    20. Urko Aguirre-Larracoechea & Cruz E. Borges, 2021. "Imputation for Repeated Bounded Outcome Data: Statistical and Machine-Learning Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1057_s41278-021-00187-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.