IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v17y2015i4p440-463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact and relevance of transit disturbances on planning in intermodal container networks using disturbance cost analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bart van Riessen

    (Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mails: vanriessen@ese.eur.nl; rdekker@ese.eur.nl
    Department of Maritime and Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands E-mails: r.r.negenborn@tudelft.nl; g.lodewijks@tudelft.nl)

  • Rudy R Negenborn

    (Department of Maritime and Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands E-mails: r.r.negenborn@tudelft.nl; g.lodewijks@tudelft.nl)

  • Gabriel Lodewijks

    (Department of Maritime and Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands E-mails: r.r.negenborn@tudelft.nl; g.lodewijks@tudelft.nl)

  • Rommert Dekker

    (Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mails: vanriessen@ese.eur.nl; rdekker@ese.eur.nl)

Abstract

In North-West Europe, the options for intermodal inland transportation of containers are increasing. Inland corridors become increasingly interconnected in hinterland networks. To minimise operating costs, new methods are required that allow integral network operations management. The network operations consist of allocating containers to available inland transportation services, that is, planning. For adequate planning it is important to adapt to occurring disturbances. In this article, a new mathematical model is proposed: the Linear Container Allocation model with Time-restrictions. This model is used for determining the influence of three main types of transit disturbances on network performance: early service departure, late service departure and cancellation of inland services. The influence of a disturbance is measured in two ways. The impact measures the additional cost incurred by an updated planning in case of a disturbance. The relevance measures the cost difference between a fully updated and a locally updated plan. With the results of the analysis, key service properties of disturbed services that result in a high impact or high relevance can be determined. Based on this, the network operator can select focus areas to prevent disturbances with high impact and to improve the planning updates in case of disturbances with high relevance. The proposed method is used in a case study to assess the impact and relevance of transit disturbances on inland services of the European Gateway Services network.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart van Riessen & Rudy R Negenborn & Gabriel Lodewijks & Rommert Dekker, 2015. "Impact and relevance of transit disturbances on planning in intermodal container networks using disturbance cost analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 17(4), pages 440-463, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:17:y:2015:i:4:p:440-463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v17/n4/pdf/mel201427a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v17/n4/full/mel201427a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bart Van Riessen & Judith Mulder & Rudy R. Negenborn & Rommert Dekker, 2021. "Revenue management with two fare classes in synchromodal container transportation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 623-662, September.
    2. Qu, Wenhua & Rezaei, Jafar & Maknoon, Yousef & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2019. "Hinterland freight transportation replanning model under the framework of synchromodality," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 308-328.
    3. Thibault Delbart & Yves Molenbruch & Kris Braekers & An Caris, 2021. "Uncertainty in Intermodal and Synchromodal Transport: Review and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Behzad Behdani & Bart Wiegmans & Violeta Roso & Hercules Haralambides, 2020. "Port-hinterland transport and logistics: emerging trends and frontier research," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Gumuskaya, Volkan & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dijkman, Remco & Grefen, Paul & Veenstra, Albert, 2020. "Dynamic barge planning with stochastic container arrivals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Beatriz Acero & Maria Jesus Saenz & Davide Luzzini, 2022. "Introducing synchromodality: One missing link between transportation and supply chain management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(1), pages 51-64, January.
    7. Sakti, Sekar & Zhang, Lele & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Synchronization in synchromodality," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Steffen Jaap Skotvoll Bakker & Jonas Martin & E. Ruben van Beesten & Ingvild Synn{o}ve Brynildsen & Anette Sandvig & Marit Siqveland & Antonia Golab, 2023. "STraM: A strategic network design model for national freight transport decarbonization," Papers 2304.14001, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    9. Li, Le & Negenborn, Rudy R. & De Schutter, Bart, 2017. "Distributed model predictive control for cooperative synchromodal freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-260.
    10. Akyüz, M. Hakan & Dekker, Rommert & Sharif Azadeh, Shadi, 2023. "Partial and complete replanning of an intermodal logistic system under disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:17:y:2015:i:4:p:440-463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.