IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v12y2010i3p263-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A statistical approach to US harbor maintenance tax rates and replacement user fees

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher R McIntosh

    (Department of Economics, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1318 Kirby Drive, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, LSBE 330H, USA)

  • Randall K Skalberg

    (Accounting Department, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1318 Kirby Drive, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, LSBE 360M, USA.)

Abstract

The US Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT) is not fulfilling its intended goal. It has led to a payment imbalance between port user groups (exporters do not pay thereby leading to consultations regarding General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) violations) and large surpluses, which have created a burgeoning trust fund balance. Statistical analysis does not support the current HMT rate; investigation reveals the HMT rate could be reduced to 0.09 per cent from 0.125 per cent. Further, as there is no evidence that value is highly correlated with costs (regardless of functional form) a possible method for designing a national user fee structure to replace the HMT is presented. This structure would be compliant with the US Supreme Court requisites for a user fee; it includes variables such as tonnage, port stay and draft, which are found to be correlated with costs using regression analysis. In addition, a method to statistically derive appropriate fee weights (rather than arbitrarily assigning) for each of these variables is outlined and illustrated by a numerical example. Currently, missing data represent a severe restriction to the design and appropriate implementation of user fees in the United States; these data could be collected but not without new procedures and incurring additional costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher R McIntosh & Randall K Skalberg, 2010. "A statistical approach to US harbor maintenance tax rates and replacement user fees," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(3), pages 263-279, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:263-279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v12/n3/pdf/mel20107a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v12/n3/full/mel20107a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Yonglei & Lu, Jing & Li, Jing & Wang, Lu, 2017. "Dynamic impacts of Harbor Tolls Policy on China's port economy – The case of Zhanjiang Port," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 37-43.
    2. Merkel, Axel & Lindgren, Samuel, 2022. "Effects of fairway dues on the deployment and utilization of vessels: Lessons from a regression discontinuity design," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 204-214.
    3. Merkel, Axel & Lindgren, Samuel, 2022. "Effects of fairway dues on the deployment and utilization of vessels: Lessons from a regression discontinuity design," Working Papers 2022:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    4. Alexandre Lavissiere, 2018. "Vessel Port Dues: An Influence from Path Dependency rather than Geography of Ports," Post-Print hal-01954461, HAL.
    5. Bandara, Yapa Mahinda & Nguyen, Hong-Oanh, 2016. "Influential factors in port infrastructure tariff formulation, implementation and revision," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 220-232.
    6. McIntosh, C.R. & Wilmot, N.A. & Skalberg, R.K., 2015. "Paying for harbor maintenance in the US: Options for moving past the Harbor Maintenance Tax," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 210-221.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:12:y:2010:i:3:p:263-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.