IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v68y2017i10d10.1057_s41274-016-0110-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vendor-buyer inventory problem revisited: modeling random yield and trade credit

Author

Listed:
  • S. Çetinkaya

    (Southern Methodist University
    Southern Methodist University)

  • Y. Zhang

    (Maxim Integrated)

  • E. Akçalı

    (University of Florida)

Abstract

This paper revisits the vendor-buyer inventory problem considering random yield and trade credit. The problem deals with a single vendor, single buyer setting with deterministic demand and stochastic supply due to the random nature of yield associated with the vendor’s production process. Since a trade credit agreement is in place, the buyer is not required to make a payment to the vendor at the time of delivery of the order. The full payment must be delivered at the end of the trade credit period dictated by the agreement. The problem of interest was originally studied by Chen and Kang (Int J Prod Econ 123(1):52–61, 2010) who treat the delivery frequency, i.e., buyer’s order cycle length, as a decision variable. The current paper demonstrates that the buyer’s order cycle length is in fact a random variable due to the random nature of yield, and there is no guarantee that the trade credit period will be longer or shorter than the buyer’s order cycle length. As a result, the modeling and solution approach presented by Chen and Kang (2010) is flawed. The approach is remedied here by formal application of renewal theory. The exact cost expressions for the vendor-buyer system are redeveloped rigorously. The newly developed expressions are utilized to investigate the optimal decisions under decentralized control. Furthermore, the results are generalized to consider a general distribution of random yield associated with the vendor’s production process. Operational and financial consequences these new and more general results are demonstrated via numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Çetinkaya & Y. Zhang & E. Akçalı, 2017. "Vendor-buyer inventory problem revisited: modeling random yield and trade credit," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1265-1278, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:68:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0110-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0110-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41274-016-0110-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41274-016-0110-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Chao-Kuei, 2004. "An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem with process unreliability consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 91-98, September.
    2. Abad, P. L. & Jaggi, C. K., 2003. "A joint approach for setting unit price and the length of the credit period for a seller when end demand is price sensitive," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 115-122, February.
    3. Toptal, Aysegul & Cetinkaya, Sila, 2008. "Quantifying the value of buyer-vendor coordination: Analytical and numerical results under different replenishment cost structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 785-805, June.
    4. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2010. "Coordination between vendor and buyer considering trade credit and items of imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 52-61, January.
    5. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Rosen, Marc A., 2008. "The economic order quantity repair and waste disposal model with entropy cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 109-120, July.
    6. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    7. Maddah, Bacel & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2008. "Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 808-815, April.
    8. J-T Teng, 2002. "On the economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(8), pages 915-918, August.
    9. Sheen, Gwo-Ji & Tsao, Yu-Chung, 2007. "Channel coordination, trade credit and quantity discounts for freight cost," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 112-128, March.
    10. Can Huang & Luc Soete, 2008. "Policy forum," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(10), pages 771-781, December.
    11. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2007. "Integrated vendor-buyer cooperative inventory models with variant permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 658-673, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2010. "Coordination between vendor and buyer considering trade credit and items of imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 52-61, January.
    2. Rezaei, Jafar & Salimi, Negin, 2012. "Economic order quantity and purchasing price for items with imperfect quality when inspection shifts from buyer to supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 11-18.
    3. Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Kang, Fu-Sen, 2010. "Integrated inventory models considering the two-level trade credit policy and a price-negotiation scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 47-58, August.
    4. Seifert, Daniel & Seifert, Ralf W. & Protopappa-Sieke, Margarita, 2013. "A review of trade credit literature: Opportunities for research in operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 245-256.
    5. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Guiffrida, A.L. & Zolfaghari, S., 2011. "A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Beatriz Abdul-Jalbar & Roberto Dorta-Guerra & José M. Gutiérrez & Joaquín Sicilia, 2021. "Production/Inventory Policies for a Two-Echelon System with Credit Period Incentives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    8. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    9. Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Rabta, Boualem & Reiner, Gerald, 2023. "Coordinating quality decisions in a two-stage supply chain under buyer dominance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Sheen, Gwo-Ji, 2012. "A multi-item supply chain with credit periods and weight freight cost discounts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 106-115.
    11. Nasr, Walid W. & Maddah, Bacel & Salameh, Moueen K., 2013. "EOQ with a correlated binomial supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 248-255.
    12. Tseng-Fung Ho & Chi-Chung Lin & Chih-Ling Lin, 2020. "Determining the Optimal Inventory and Number of Shipments for a Two-Resource Supply Chain with Correlated Demands and Remanufacturing Products Allowing Backorder," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    14. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Zhong, Yuanguang & Li, Jicai, 2012. "An uncooperative order model for items with trade credit, inventory-dependent demand and limited displayed-shelf space," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 76-85.
    15. Anuraag Gutgutia & J. K. Jha, 2018. "A closed-form solution for the distribution free continuous review integrated inventory model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 159-186, April.
    16. Du, Ruo & Banerjee, Avijit & Kim, Seung-Lae, 2013. "Coordination of two-echelon supply chains using wholesale price discount and credit option," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 327-334.
    17. Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & María José Lea Plaza-Makowsky & María Alejandra Sevilla-Roca & José María Núñez-Baumert & Buddhadev Mandal, 2021. "An Inventory Model for Imperfect Quality Products with Rework, Distinct Holding Costs, and Nonlinear Demand Dependent on Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    19. Kelle, Peter & Transchel, Sandra & Minner, Stefan, 2009. "Buyer-supplier cooperation and negotiation support with random yield consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 152-159, March.
    20. Maddah, Bacel & Moussawi, Lama & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2010. "Lot sizing with a Markov production process and imperfect items scrapped," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 340-347, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:68:y:2017:i:10:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0110-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.