IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v57y2006i4d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal inventory policy for specialty chemical products in multiple packages

Author

Listed:
  • E J Comeaux

    (Louisiana State University)

  • B R Sarker

    (Louisiana State University)

Abstract

Many products are inventoried and sold in multiple outer packages, which causes the manufacturer or distributor to maintain a segmented inventory. Oftentimes, this scenario leads to shortages in some packages and over-stock in other package types. The shortages are usually linked to specific shortage costs, and the over-stock is always associated with some sort of unnecessary holding cost that either erodes profit margins or results in increased costs for the consumer. In this paper, the inventory policy for a specialty chemical manufacturer's cleaner, which is inventoried in four unique packages, is studied. A mathematical model is developed to account for the costs associated with initial procurement, holding and repackaging (shortage), which are the primary costs associated with the inventory system. Based upon this model, an optimal inventory policy is generated that reduces the need for repackaging, without requiring a prohibitive amount of safety stock. A specific historical case is summarized, and the results of this example are compared with the results that the new inventory policy would have produced, given the same circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • E J Comeaux & B R Sarker, 2006. "Optimal inventory policy for specialty chemical products in multiple packages," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(4), pages 357-366, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:57:y:2006:i:4:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602010
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602010
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Najjar, Nabil I., 1999. "On the robustness of factor structures to asset repackaging," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 309-320, April.
    2. Elizabeth A. Wilman, 1987. "A Simple Repackaging Model of Recreational Choices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 603-612.
    3. Hillier, Mark S., 2002. "Using commonality as backup safety stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 353-365, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Diponegoro, Ahmad, 2009. "Optimal production plans and shipment schedules in a supply-chain system with multiple suppliers and multiple buyers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 753-773, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. HEIFETZ, Aviad & MINELLI, Enrico & POLEMARCHAKIS, Heracles, 1999. "Arbitrage and equilibrium with exchangeable risks," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1999046, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Gagliardini, Patrick & Ossola, Elisa & Scaillet, Olivier, 2019. "A diagnostic criterion for approximate factor structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 503-521.
    3. repec:gnv:wpaper:unige:76321 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Isabel Mendes & Isabel Proença, 2005. "Estimating the Recreation Value of Ecosystems by Using a Travel Cost Method Approach," Working Papers Department of Economics 2005/08, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    5. Patrick Gagliardini & Elisa Ossola & Olivier Scaillet, 2016. "Time‐Varying Risk Premium in Large Cross‐Sectional Equity Data Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 985-1046, May.
    6. Isabel Mendes & Isabel Proença, 2009. "Measuring the Social Recreation Per-Day Net Benefit of Wildlife Amenities of a National Park: A Count-Data Travel Cost Approach," Working Papers Department of Economics 2009/35, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    7. Wiktor Adamowicz & Sarah Jennings & Alison Coyne, 1989. "A Sequential Choice Alternative to the Travel Cost Model," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 37(4), pages 1305-1305, December.
    8. Persona, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Manzini, Riccardo & Pareschi, Arrigo, 2007. "Optimal safety stock levels of subassemblies and manufacturing components," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 147-159, October.
    9. Gagliardini, Patrick & Ossola, Elisa & Scaillet, Olivier, 2019. "Estimation of large dimensional conditional factor models in finance," Working Papers unige:125031, University of Geneva, Geneva School of Economics and Management.
    10. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    11. Eric Renault & Thijs Van Der & Bas J M Werker, 2023. "Arbitrage Pricing Theory for Idiosyncratic Variance Factors," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 1403-1442.
    12. Wenyuan Wang & Daniel Y. Mo & Yue Wang & Mitchell M. Tseng, 2019. "Assessing the cost structure of component reuse in a product family for remanufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 575-587, February.
    13. Wiktor L. Adamowicz, 1988. "Behavioral Implications of Nonmarket Valuation Models," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 36(4), pages 929-939, December.
    14. Tibben-Lembke, Ronald S. & Bassok, Yehuda, 2005. "An inventory model for delayed customization: A hybrid approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 748-764, September.
    15. Betts, John M. & Johnston, Robert B., 2005. "Just-in-time component replenishment decisions for assemble-to-order manufacturing under capital constraint and stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 51-70, January.
    16. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger & Schepens, Luc, 2008. "Analysis of an industrial component commonality problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 801-811, April.
    17. Deflem, Yannick & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke, 2013. "Managing inventories with one-way substitution: A newsvendor analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 484-493.
    18. Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2011. "Decentralizing decision making in modularization strategies: Overcoming barriers from dysfunctional accounting systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 453-462, June.
    19. Kyle Cattani & Geraldo Ferrer & Wendell Gilland, 2003. "Simultaneous production of market‐specific and global products: A two‐stage stochastic program with additional demand after recourse," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 438-461, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:57:y:2006:i:4:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.