IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v56y2005i10d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two optimization models of the optimum inspection problem

Author

Listed:
  • R Jiang

    (University of Toronto)

  • A K S Jardine

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

This paper deals with establishing an optimum inspection schedule for systems that are subject to random failure and where the failure can be detected only through an inspection. The paper reviews ‘classical’ optimum checking policies. Two new optimization models are proposed to find the optimum sequence of inspection times. Theoretical analysis and numerical examples show that the optimum inspection time sequence derived from the proposed models is relatively accurate, robust, and computationally simple.

Suggested Citation

  • R Jiang & A K S Jardine, 2005. "Two optimization models of the optimum inspection problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(10), pages 1176-1183, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:56:y:2005:i:10:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601885
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601885
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph B. Keller, 1974. "Optimum Checking Schedules for Systems Subject to Random Failure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 256-260, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phan, Dzung T. & Zhu, Yada, 2015. "Multi-stage optimization for periodic inspection planning of geo-distributed infrastructure systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 797-804.
    2. R Pascual & D Louit & A K S Jardine, 2011. "Optimal inspection intervals for safety systems with partial inspections," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(12), pages 2051-2062, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.
    2. Leung, Francis Kit-nam, 2001. "Inspection schedules when the lifetime distribution of a single-unit system is completely unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 106-115, July.
    3. Ahmadi, Reza & Wu, Shaomin, 2017. "A novel data-driven approach to optimizing replacement policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 506-516.
    4. Mesak, Hani I. & Zhang, Hongkai & Pullis, Joe M., 2010. "On optimal service capacity allocation policy in an advance selling environment in continuous time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 505-512, June.
    5. Fakher, Hossein Beheshti & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Gendreau, Michel, 2018. "Integrating production, maintenance and quality: A multi-period multi-product profit-maximization model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 191-201.
    6. Nakagawa, T. & Mizutani, S., 2009. "A summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 89-96.
    7. Jonathan E. Helm & Mariel S. Lavieri & Mark P. Van Oyen & Joshua D. Stein & David C. Musch, 2015. "Dynamic Forecasting and Control Algorithms of Glaucoma Progression for Clinician Decision Support," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 979-999, October.
    8. Darghouth, M.N. & Chelbi, Anis & Ait-kadi, Daoud, 2012. "A profit assessment model for equipment inspection and replacement under renewing free replacement warranty policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 899-906.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:56:y:2005:i:10:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.