IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v54y2003i7d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of a hybrid feature selection algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • K-M Osei-Bryson

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

  • K Giles

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

  • B Kositanurit

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

Abstract

In the Knowledge Discovery Process, classification algorithms are often used to help create models with training data that can be used to predict the classes of untested data instances. While there are several factors involved with classification algorithms that can influence classification results, such as the node splitting measures used in making decision trees, feature selection is often used as a pre-classification step when using large data sets to help eliminate irrelevant or redundant attributes in order to increase computational efficiency and possibly to increase classification accuracy. One important factor common to both feature selection as well as to classification using decision trees is attribute discretization, which is the process of dividing attribute values into a smaller number of discrete values. In this paper, we will present and explore a new hybrid approach, ChiBlur, which involves the use of concepts from both the blurring and χ 2-based approaches to feature selection, as well as concepts from multi-objective optimization. We will compare this new algorithm with algorithms based on the blurring and χ 2-based approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • K-M Osei-Bryson & K Giles & B Kositanurit, 2003. "Exploration of a hybrid feature selection algorithm," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(7), pages 790-797, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:54:y:2003:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601565
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601565
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N Bryson & A Joseph, 2001. "Optimal techniques for class-dependent attribute discretization," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(10), pages 1130-1143, October.
    2. Selwyn Piramuthu, 1999. "Feature Selection for Financial Credit-Risk Evaluation Decisions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 258-266, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R Fildes & K Nikolopoulos & S F Crone & A A Syntetos, 2008. "Forecasting and operational research: a review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1150-1172, September.
    2. Juheng Zhang & Selwyn Piramuthu, 2018. "Product recommendation with latent review topics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 617-625, June.
    3. Xiao-Bai Li & James Sweigart & James Teng & Joan Donohue & Lori Thombs, 2001. "A Dynamic Programming Based Pruning Method for Decision Trees," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 332-344, November.
    4. Juheng Zhang & Selwyn Piramuthu, 0. "Product recommendation with latent review topics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-9.
    5. K Falangis & J J Glen, 2010. "Heuristics for feature selection in mathematical programming discriminant analysis models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 804-812, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:54:y:2003:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.