IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ijodag/v19y2022i2d10.1057_s41310-021-00136-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual 8-K filings and auditor downward switches

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Monteiro Miller

    (Quinnipiac University)

Abstract

In the USA, firms announce auditor changes in either one or multiple filings of Form 8-K, depending on the length of time between the end of the incumbent audit engagement and the engagement of the successor auditor. I find that auditor changes reported using multiple 8-K filings (referred to as “dual 8-K filings”) are associated with a 7% greater likelihood of downgrading from a big-N to a non-big-N audit firm. Dual 8-K filings provide information that is incremental to the length of the auditor search period. In addition, they provide a timelier signal, as it is immediately observable upon the initial 8-K filing whether a successor auditor has been named or a second 8-K filing announcing the successor auditor is expected to follow. The distinction between single and dual 8-K filings outperforms the distinction between auditor resignations and dismissals in predicting downward auditor switches, though the most negative auditor changes are those reported both as auditor resignations and using dual 8-K filings. My results suggest that dual 8-K filings are a strong signal of risk associated with auditor changes that should be considered by academics and practitioners alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Monteiro Miller, 2022. "Dual 8-K filings and auditor downward switches," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 204-217, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:19:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-021-00136-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41310-021-00136-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41310-021-00136-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41310-021-00136-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vivek Mande & Myungsoo Son, 2011. "Do audit delays affect client retention?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(1), pages 32-50, January.
    2. Michael K. Fung & Louis T.W. Cheng & Tak-yan Leung, 2019. "The signalling cost of hiring a large auditor: evidence from the fee differential between large and small auditors," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 196-211.
    3. Zhan Shu, Susan, 2000. "Auditor resignations: clientele effects and legal liability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 173-205, April.
    4. Christine I. Wiedman & Kevin B. Hendricks, 2013. "Firm Accrual Quality Following Restatements: A Signaling View," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9-10), pages 1095-1125, November.
    5. Louis, Henock, 2005. "Acquirers' abnormal returns and the non-Big 4 auditor clientele effect," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 75-99, December.
    6. Smith, Db, 1988. "An Investigation Of Securities-And-Exchange-Commission Regulation Of Auditor Change Disclosures - The Case Of Accounting Series Release No 165," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 134-145.
    7. Connie L. Becker & Mark L. Defond & James Jiambalvo & K.R. Subramanyam, 1998. "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Mande, Vivek & Son, Myungsoo & Song, Hakjoon, 2017. "Auditor search periods as signals of engagement risk: Effects on auditor choice and audit pricing," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 15-29.
    9. Palmrose, Zv, 1986. "Audit Fees And Auditor Size - Further Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 97-110.
    10. John Dunn & David Hillier & Andrew Marshall, 1999. "The market reaction to auditor resignations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 95-108.
    11. Totok Budisantoso & Rahmawati Rahmawati & Bandi Bandi & Agung Nur Probohudono, 2017. "Audit Opinion Accuracy, Corporate Governance and Downward Auditor Switching: A Study of Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economics Community," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 530-540.
    12. Hossain, Mahmud & Mitra, Santanu & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2014. "Voluntary disclosure of reasons for auditor changes and the capital market reaction to information disclosure," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 40-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhenfeng & Lin, Stephen, 2019. "Determinants and consequences of voluntary switches to Chinese auditors in Hong Kong," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    2. Stuart, Iris & Shin, Yong-Chul & Cram, Donald P. & Karan, Vijay, 2013. "Review of choice-based, matched, and other stratified sample studies in auditing research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-113.
    3. Cullinan, Charles P. & Du, Hui & Zheng, Xiaochuan, 2012. "Barriers to entry to the big firm audit market: Evidence from market reaction to switches to second Tier audit firms in the post-sox period," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 6-14.
    4. Bugeja, Martin, 2011. "Takeover premiums and the perception of auditor independence and reputation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 278-293.
    5. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    6. Sattar A. Mansi & William F. Maxwell & Darius P. Miller, 2004. "Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 755-793, September.
    7. Omrane Guedhami & Jeffrey A. Pittman & Walid Saffar, 2014. "Auditor Choice in Politically Connected Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 107-162, March.
    8. Ho, Nam, 2023. "Local competition and auditors' provision of non-audit services," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Griffin, Paul A. & Lont, David H., 2011. "Audit fees around dismissals and resignations: Additional evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 65-81.
    10. Stefano Azzali & Tatiana Mazza & Fernanda Alberto, 2021. "Effects of disclosed audit sanctions on audit firm’s market share in Italy and Spain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2477-2505, April.
    11. Asif M. Huq & Fredrik Hartwig & Niklas Rudholm, 2022. "Do audited firms have a lower cost of debt?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 153-175, June.
    12. Cook, Jonathan & Kowaleski, Zachary T. & Minnis, Michael & Sutherland, Andrew & Zehms, Karla M., 2020. "Auditors are known by the companies they keep," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    13. Cheng Y Lai & Yang Li & Yaowen Shan & Stephen Taylor, 2013. "Costs of mandatory international financial reporting standards: Evidence of reduced accrual reliability," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 38(3), pages 491-521, December.
    14. Mande, Vivek & Son, Myungsoo & Song, Hakjoon, 2017. "Auditor search periods as signals of engagement risk: Effects on auditor choice and audit pricing," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 15-29.
    15. Hamida Chihi & Jean-François Casta, 2014. "Auditor Rotation And Audit Quality: Meta-Analysis [La Rotation De L'Auditeur Et La Qualite De L'Audit : Une Meta-Analyse]," Post-Print hal-01899770, HAL.
    16. Kwang Wuk Oh & Seok Woo Jeong & Seon Mi Kim & Seung Weon Yoo, 2017. "The Effect of IPO Risks on Auditors’ Decisions: Auditor Designation Case," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(4), pages 421-441, December.
    17. Steve Fortin & Jeffrey A. Pittman, 2007. "The Role of Auditor Choice in Debt Pricing in Private Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 859-896, September.
    18. Augustine O. Okolie Ph.D, FCA, 2014. "Audit Firm Size and Market Price Per Share of Quoted Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(5), pages 100-117, May.
    19. Brad Badertscher & Bjorn Jorgensen & Sharon Katz & William Kinney, 2014. "Public Equity and Audit Pricing in the United States," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 303-339, May.
    20. Reheul, Anne-Mie & Van Caneghem, Tom & Verbruggen, Sandra, 2011. "Auditor choice in the Belgian nonprofit sector: a behavioral perspective," Working Papers 2011/36, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditor changes; 8-K filings; Downward auditor switches; Auditing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:19:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-021-00136-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.