IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v25y2013i1p78-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struggles in Paris: The DAC and the Purposes of Development Aid

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalind Eyben

    (University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.)

Abstract

This article historicises the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Development Assistance Committee (DAC) as a site where the meanings of development and the purposes of aid were contested and where gradually a more diverse set of actors were invited to engage in the argument. The author's ethnographic approach examines the micro-level processes of ideological struggle in a ‘closed space’ that transformed into an ‘invited’ one. During this transformation, rights-based approaches to development rose and fell within a changing global landscape wherein the DAC seeks to sustain a foothold. The article concludes by considering the future of debates about development within the post-Busan Global Partnership in which the DAC is only one of many stakeholders.Dans une perspective historique, cet article envisage le Comité d’aide au développement (CAD) de l’OCDE comme un espace où les définitions du développement et les objectifs de l’aide ont été contestés et où un ensemble plus diversifié d’acteurs ont progressivement été invités à prendre part au débat. S’inscrivant dans une approche ethnographique, l’auteur examine les microprocessus de lutte idéologique dans un « espace clos » qui s’est transformé en un « espace d’invitation », transformation au cours de laquelle les approches du développement fondées sur les droits de l’homme ont progressé puis reculé dans un contexte global en mutation au sein duquel le CAD cherche à renforcer sa position. L’article conclut en s’interrogeant sur l’avenir des débats concernant le développement dans le cadre du Partenariat mondial de Busan, où le DAC n’est qu’une partie prenante parmi bien d’autres

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalind Eyben, 2013. "Struggles in Paris: The DAC and the Purposes of Development Aid," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 25(1), pages 78-91, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:25:y:2013:i:1:p:78-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v25/n1/pdf/ejdr201249a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v25/n1/full/ejdr201249a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niels Keijzer, 2016. "Open Data on a Closed Shop? Assessing the potential of transparency initiatives with a focus on efforts to strengthen capacity development support," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(1), pages 83-100, January.
    2. Stephen Brown, 2020. "The Rise and Fall of the Aid Effectiveness Norm," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1248, September.
    3. Emma Mawdsley & Warwick E. Murray & John Overton & Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks, 2018. "Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity†: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 25-43, March.
    4. Robin Davies & Jonathan Pickering, 2017. "How should development co-operation evolve? Views from developing countries," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 10-28, July.
    5. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    6. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2016. "The DAC is Dead, Long Live the DCF? A Comparative Analysis of the OECD Development Assistance Committee and the UN Development Cooperation Forum," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(4), pages 571-587, September.
    7. Sung-Mi Kim, 2017. "International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1086-1101, November.
    8. Antonio Sianes, 2021. "Academic Research on the 2030 Agenda: Challenges of a Transdisciplinary Field of Study," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 286-297, May.
    9. Gugerty, Mary Kay & Mitchell, George E. & Santamarina, Francisco J., 2021. "Discourses of evaluation: Institutional logics and organizational practices among international development agencies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2018. "Ignoring the elephant in the room? Assessing the impact of the European Union on the Development Assistance Committee's role in international development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 44-58, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:25:y:2013:i:1:p:78-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.