IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v4y2010i7p21-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining the difference between unemployment and the claimant count

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth Clancy

    (Office for National Statistics)

  • Peter Stam

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

SUMMARYUnemployment and the claimant count are both important measures of spare labour capacity in the UK economy. However, they each record subtly different aspects of the non-utilisation of labour. Unemployment estimates are based on a person's self-classification as being ‘out of work, but ‘currently and actively seeking to work’ in the Labour Force Survey (LFS), while the claimant count is a count of the number of people who claim unemployment related benefits (the majority of whom claim Jobseeker's allowance (JSA)). This article examines the reasons that the two measures provide different estimates, and presents analysis on the groups of people that make up the gap between unemployment and the claimant count. The article finds that the differences in definitions contribute to this gap, but there are also other reasons for the changing size of the gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth Clancy & Peter Stam, 2010. "Explaining the difference between unemployment and the claimant count," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 4(7), pages 21-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:4:y:2010:i:7:p:21-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v4/n7/pdf/elmr201093a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v4/n7/full/elmr201093a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom Kirchmaier & Carmen Villa-Llera, 2020. "Covid-19 and changing crime trends in England and Wales," CEP Covid-19 Analyses cepcovid-19-013, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:4:y:2010:i:7:p:21-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.