IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/easeco/v38y2012i3p381-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School, Department, and Instructor Determinants of Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Economics Courses

Author

Listed:
  • Georg Schaur

    (Department of Economics, University of Tennessee, 505A Stokely Management Center, Knoxville, TN 37996-0550, USA.)

  • Michael Watts

    (Department of Economics, Purdue University, 425 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2056, USA)

  • William E Becker

    (1] Indiana University[2] University of South Australia[3] Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)[4] Center for Economic Studies and Institute for Economic Research (CESifo), 325 Blue Ridge Drive, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA)

Abstract

We identify factors related to instructors’ choice of assessment methods in undergraduate economics courses, using national survey data collected in 1995, 2000, and 2005. Respondents were asked to indicate which of 10 different assessment methods they used in four different types of courses (principles, intermediate theory, econometrics and statistics, and other upper-division field courses), and to provide background information on school, department, and individual factors that might influence the choice of assessment methods, including time spent on research vs teaching, perceived incentives/rewards for those activities in their departments and schools, class size, and the individual instructor's rank, years of teaching experience, gender, and native language. Both probit and OLS specifications show most of these individual variables to be important in determining the choice of assessment methods in at least some types of courses, but only rarely across all types of courses. Two variables reflecting school missions and departmental policies are, however, important determinants of using essay questions and longer written assignments, such as term papers: class size (especially classes with more than 40 students) and semester teaching loads for faculty members.

Suggested Citation

  • Georg Schaur & Michael Watts & William E Becker, 2012. "School, Department, and Instructor Determinants of Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Economics Courses," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 381-400.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:38:y:2012:i:3:p:381-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v38/n3/pdf/eej201120a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v38/n3/full/eej201120a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diego Mendez-Carbajo, 2023. "The Effectiveness of Logical Distractors in an Online Module," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 15-30, January.
    2. Cynthia Harter & Georg Schaur & Michael Watts, 2015. "School, department, and instructor determinants of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(4), pages 1169-1188, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:38:y:2012:i:3:p:381-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.