IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/easeco/v34y2008i1p74-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of Libel Law

Author

Listed:
  • Manoj Dalvi

    (C. W. Post Campus, Long Island University, 720 Northern Blvd., Brookville, NY 11548, USA.)

  • James F Refalo

    (California State University, 5151 State University Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA)

Abstract

This paper examines the welfare implications of different libel law standards as applied to newspapers in publishing stories. Our work extends the current literature by permitting private and public incentives to deviate, giving rise to an agency problem, and by formulating a two-stage decision model based on a story's expected value. We show that the negligence standard provides incentives for the agent to take actions, merely to insure itself against liability. This results in a deadweight loss to society. We also show that both standards can be socially inefficient; however, correction using policy tools under strict liability places a lower informational burden on policy makers, than does the negligence standard. Eastern Economic Journal (2008) 34, 74–94. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050003

Suggested Citation

  • Manoj Dalvi & James F Refalo, 2008. "An Economic Analysis of Libel Law," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 74-94, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:34:y:2008:i:1:p:74-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v34/n1/pdf/9050003a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v34/n1/full/9050003a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David J. Acheson & Ansgar Wohlschlegel, 2021. "Libel Bullies, Defamation Victims, and Litigation Incentives," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 177(2), pages 135-166.
    2. Bignon, Vincent & Flandreau, Marc, 2011. "The Economics of Badmouthing: Libel Law and the Underworld of the Financial Press in France Before World War I," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 616-653, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:34:y:2008:i:1:p:74-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.