IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/compes/v47y2005i1p200-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocative and Technical Efficiency of Corporate Farms in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Margarita Grazhdaninova

    (AFE – Analytical Centre for Agri-Food Economics, Moscow, Russia.)

  • Zvi Lerman

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.)

Abstract

The efficiency of Russian corporate farms is analysed using the data of a 2003 survey. Allocative efficiency is assessed using the value of marginal product of inputs from production function estimation; technical efficiency is determined using Data Envelopment Analysis. The analysis is carried out on three aggregation levels: total farm; production sectors (crops, livestock); selected commodities. The results suggest that there is no substantial misallocation of resources given current input and output prices. High technical efficiency scores suggest that the production technologies are homogeneous, and simple extension of ‘best practice’ production will not eliminate the productivity gaps between Russia and the developed market economies. Comparative Economic Studies (2005) 47, 200–213. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100089

Suggested Citation

  • Margarita Grazhdaninova & Zvi Lerman, 2005. "Allocative and Technical Efficiency of Corporate Farms in Russia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 47(1), pages 200-213, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:47:y:2005:i:1:p:200-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ces/journal/v47/n1/pdf/8100089a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ces/journal/v47/n1/full/8100089a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael A Trueblood & Carlos Arnade, 2001. "Crop Yield Convergence: How Russia's Yield Performance Has Compared to Global Yield Leaders," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 43(2), pages 59-81, July.
    2. Lerman, Zvi & Kislev, Yoav & Biton, David & Kriss, Alon, 2003. "Agricultural Output and Productivity in the Former Soviet Republics," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(4), pages 999-1018, July.
    3. Evgeniya Serova & Olga Shick, 2005. "Markets for Purchased Farm Inputs in Russia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 47(1), pages 154-166, March.
    4. Sedik, David & Trueblood, Michael & Arnade, Carlos, 1999. "Corporate Farm Performance in Russia, 1991-1995: An Efficiency Analysis," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 514-533, September.
    5. E. Serova & O. Shick., 2005. "Markets for Purchased Farm Inputs," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 6.
    6. Osborne, Stefan & Trueblood, Michael A., 2002. "Agricultural Productivity And Efficiency In Russia And Ukraine: Building On A Decade Of Reform," Agricultural Economic Reports 33937, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Badunenko, Oleg & Fritsch, Michael & Stephan, Andreas, 2008. "Allocative efficiency measurement revisited--Do we really need input prices?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1093-1109, September.
    2. Zhu, Xueqin & Demeter, Robert Milan & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2008. "Competitiveness of dairy farms in three countries: the role of CAP subsidies," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44143, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kamel Helali & Maha Kalai, 2015. "Technical Efficiency Determinants Of The Tunisian Manufacturing Industry: Stochastic Production Frontiers Estimates On Panel Data," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 40(2), pages 105-130, June.
    4. Gardner, Bruce L. & Lerman, Zvi, 2006. "Agricultural Cooperative Enterprise in the Transition from Socialist Collective Farming," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Hamsa, K.R. & Umesh, K.B., 2021. "Technical Efficiency in Finger Millet and Paddy Crop in Southern Karnataka: Application of Data Envelop Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Approach," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315862, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Sarris, Alexander H. & Savastano, Sara & Christiaensen, Luc J.M., 2006. "The Role of Agriculture in Reducing Poverty in Tanzania: A Household Perspective from Rural Kilimanjaro and Ruvuma," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25573, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascal Grouiez, 2014. "Farming strategies regarding "social responsibility" in the Russian agricultural sector," Post-Print halshs-01064450, HAL.
    2. Bezlepkina, Irina V. & Huirne, Ruud B.M. & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M. & Oskam, Arie J., 2005. "Analysing Variation in Russian Dairy Farms, 1990-2001," 94th Seminar, April 9-10, 2005, Ashford, UK 24444, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Pascal Grouiez, 2012. "Farming strategies regarding the production of collective goods in the Russian agricultural sector," Working Papers hal-00694352, HAL.
    4. Raushan Bokusheva & Heinrich Hockmann, 2006. "Production risk and technical inefficiency in Russian agriculture," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(1), pages 93-118, March.
    5. Scott Rozelle & Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2004. "Success and Failure of Reform: Insights from the Transition of Agriculture," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 404-456, June.
    6. Lerman, Zvi, 2001. "A Decade Of Land Reform And Farm Restructuring: What Russia Can Learn From The World Experience," Discussion Papers 14985, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    7. Johan F. M. Swinnen & Liesbeth Dries & Karen Macours, 2005. "Transition and agricultural labor," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 15-34, January.
    8. Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Radeloff, Volker C. & Muller, Daniel & Dubinin, Maxim & Baumann, Matthias, 2011. "Determinants Of Agricultural Land Abandonment In Postsoviet European Russia," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 120390, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Veronique Beckers & Jeroen Beckers & Matthias Vanmaercke & Etienne Van Hecke & Anton Van Rompaey & Nicolas Dendoncker, 2018. "Modelling Farm Growth and Its Impact on Agricultural Land Use: A Country Scale Application of an Agent-Based Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2005. "Agricultural transformation: Lessons from experience," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(1), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Svetlov, Nikolai M. & Hockmann, Heinrich, 2005. "Technical And Economic Efficiency Of Russian Corporate Farms: The Case Of The Moscow Region," IAMO Discussion Papers 14922, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    12. Einex, Christian & Lissitsa, Alexej & Parkhomenko, Sergiy, 2005. "Getreideproduktion in der Ukraine: eine komparative Analyse von Produktionskosten [Grain production in Ukraine – A comparative analysis of production costs]," IAMO Discussion Papers 79, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    13. Baaquie, Belal Ehsan & Roehner, Bertrand M. & Wang, Qing-hai, 2017. "The wage transition in developed countries and its implications for China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 470(C), pages 197-216.
    14. Daoud, Adel & Reinsberg, Bernhard & Kentikelenis, Alexander E. & Stubbs, Thomas H. & King, Lawrence P., 2019. "The International Monetary Fund’s interventions in food and agriculture: An analysis of loans and conditions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 204-218.
    15. Prishchepov, Alexander & Ponkina, Elena & Sun, Zhanli & Müller, Daniel, 2019. "Выявление Детерминант Урожайности Пшеницы В Западной Сибири С Использованием Байесовских Сетей [Revealing the Determinants of Wheat Yields in the Siberian Breadbasket of Russia with Bayesian Networ," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 39-83.
    16. Einax, Christian & Lissitsa, Alexej & Parkhomenko, Sergiy, 2005. "Getreideproduktion In Der Ukraine -- Eine Komparative Analyse Von Produktionskosten," IAMO Discussion Papers 14892, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Beddow, Jason M. & Hurley, Terrance M. & Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M., 2015. "Rethinking yield gaps," Staff Papers 201093, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Pisek Gerdsri & Dundar F. Kocaoglu, 2013. "Evaluating Nanotechnologies For The Development Of National Agriculture Industry," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 1-21.
    19. Irina Bezlepkina & Arie Oskam & Alfons Oude Lansink & Ruud Huirne, 2004. "Development and performance of Russian agricultural enterprises, 1990-2001," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 439-457.
    20. repec:lic:licosd:17206 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Pavliashvili, Johanna, 2009. "Servicekooperativen: Ein Modell für die georgische Landwirtschaft? [Service cooperatives – A model for the Georgian agriculture?]," IAMO Discussion Papers 125, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:47:y:2005:i:1:p:200-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.