IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pai/apunup/es-25-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reformas políticas y eficiencia económica hacia un análisis económico de la democracia: los fundamentos del Neo-institucionalismo

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Fernández-Baca

Abstract

El artículo tiene como objetivo presentar el estado actual de la ciencia económica en el estudio de los procesos políticos y su importancia en la asignación de los recursos. La primera parte presenta una descripción. La primera parte presenta una descripción general del neo-institucionalismo, como corriente que busca generalizar la teoría económica para adaptarla al estudio de las instituciones sociales y políticas. Luego se revisan los principales avances de esta escuela en el estudio de temas como la importancia del balance de poderes, la estabilidad de las decisiones en el Congreso y la influencia de los grupos de poder en las decisiones de los legisladores. El artículo concluye con algunas recomendaciones que se pueden extraer de estos modelos para mejorar el funcionamiento del sistema democrático peruano.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Fernández-Baca, 1989. "Reformas políticas y eficiencia económica hacia un análisis económico de la democracia: los fundamentos del Neo-institucionalismo," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 16(25), pages 27-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-25-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/download/296/298
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. North, Douglass C., 1979. "A framework for analyzing the state in economic history," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 249-259, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josh Lerner, 2002. "150 Years of Patent Protection," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 221-225, May.
    2. J. Winiecki, 1996. "The superiority of eliminating barriers to entrepreneurship over privatisation activism of the state," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 49(198), pages 313-331.
    3. François Facchini, 2011. "Paysages et théorie (s) du marché," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00637001, HAL.
    4. Sergio Parrinello, 2002. "The 'institutional factor' in the theory of international trade: new vs. old trade theories," Chapters, in: Stephan Boehm & Christian Gehrke & Heinz D. Kurz & Richard Sturn (ed.), Is There Progress in Economics?, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Winands, Sarah & Holm-Müller, Karin, 2014. "Eco-regional Cartels on the Genetic Resource Market and the case of the Andean Community's legislation," Discussion Papers 163046, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Ennio E. Piano, 2019. "State capacity and public choice: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 289-309, January.
    7. Alessandra Casella & Jonathan S. Feinstein, 1990. "Public Goods in Trade: On the Formation of Markets and Political Jurisdictions," NBER Working Papers 3554, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Eggertsson, Thrainn, 1997. "The old theory of economic policy and the new institutionalism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 1187-1203, August.
    9. Helge Peukert, 2001. "Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller and Douglass C. North, Seen with Oldinstitutionalists' Eyes," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 91-130, March.
    10. Moon, Wanki, 2017. "Developing an Institutional Political Economy Framework Integrating Firms, Markets, and States," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252532, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Oliver Volckart & Antje Mangels, 1999. "Are the Roots of the Modern Lex Mercatoria Really Medieval?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(3), pages 427-450, January.
    12. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, 2019. "Parasitstatens logik: Et Leviathan-perspektiv på danske regeringers økonomiske politik [The logic of the parasite state: A Leviathan perspective on the economic policies of Danish governments]," MPRA Paper 102406, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. J. Winiecki, 1996. "The superiority of eliminating barriers to entrepreneurship over privatisation activism of the state," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 49(198), pages 313-331.
    14. Ullah, Kafait & Arentsen, Maarten J. & Lovett, Jon C., 2017. "Institutional determinants of power sector reform in Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 332-339.
    15. Amelung, Torsten, 1988. "The political economy of import substitution and subsequent trade liberalization: The case of Turkey," Kiel Working Papers 330, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-25-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.