IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxviiy2017i1p345-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Strategic Behavior of Companies in Romanian Competitive Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Nicodim Liliana

    ("Ovidius" University of Constanta)

  • Croitoru Gabriel

    (“Valahia†University of Targoviste)

  • Duică Mircea

    (“Valahia†University of Targoviste)

Abstract

In the context of compliance to the requirements of local and regional sustainable developmentwith due regard to the interests of harmonization territorial actors, it seems appropriate to addressthe institutional systems and the reconfiguration of local and regional unit of analysis of theinteraction between companies and location of work. We believe that solutions to improve thestrategic behavior is a constant theme relevance and the need for a scientific approach addsknowledge, especially by acknowledging errors strategic positioning and the strategic goal todevelop recommendations to recover this gap. Our approach focuses on identifying organizationalmodels that provide company management tool suitable methodological requirements of thecurrent competitive environment, and we thought it was appropriate to analyze the evolution ofconcepts dominant areas interrelated research theoretical and methodological applicative:strategy, strategic management, and strategic behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicodim Liliana & Croitoru Gabriel & Duică Mircea, 2017. "The Strategic Behavior of Companies in Romanian Competitive Environment," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 345-350, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xvii:y:2017:i:1:p:345-350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/ENG/2017/Section-IV/15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foss, Nicolai J. (ed.), 1997. "Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198781790.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    2. Klaus Rathe & Ulrich Witt, 2001. "The Nature of the Firm – Static versus Developmental Interpretations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 5(3), pages 331-351, September.
    3. Forsgren, Mats & Pedersen, Torben & Foss, Nicolai J., 1999. "Accounting for the strengths of MNC subsidiaries: the case of foreign-owned firms in Denmark," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 181-196, April.
    4. Gonzalez-Diaz, Manuel & Arrunada, Benito & Fernandez, Alberto, 2000. "Causes of subcontracting: evidence from panel data on construction firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 167-187, June.
    5. Musso, Fabio & Francioni, Barbara, 2009. "Foreign markets entry mode decision for SMEs. Key factors and role of industrial districts," MPRA Paper 32153, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Camisón, César & Forés, Beatriz, 2011. "Knowledge creation and absorptive capacity: The effect of intra-district shared competences," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 66-86, March.
    7. Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2007. "Justifying the Origin of Real Options and their Difficult Evaluation in Strategic Management," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 59(4), pages 387-405, October.
    8. Heimeriks, K. & Duysters, G.M. & Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M., 2004. "The evolution of alliance capabilities," Working Papers 04.20, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    9. Amena Sibghatullah & Musarrat Shamshir & Kamran Siddiqui & Nazia Saeed, 2019. "The Unifi Cation Of Product Life-Cycle And Industry Life-Cycle: A Framework For Telecom Sector In Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 15(1), pages 15-12.
    10. Crosthwaite, Jim & Moll, Jim & Dorrough, Josh & Malcolm, Bill, 2009. "Re-organising farm businesses to improve environmental outcomes," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 17, pages 1-25.
    11. Thierry BURGER-HELMCHEN, 2004. "How do real options come into existence? A step toward an option- based theory of the firm," Finance 0409054, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Tiziano Raffaelli, 2004. "Whatever happened to Marshall's industrial economics?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 209-229.
    13. Harald Bathelt & Andrew Munro & Ben Spigel, 2011. "Challenges of Transformation: Innovation, Re-bundling and Traditional Manufacturing in Canada's Technology Triangle," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1111, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2011.
    14. Sachs Sybille, 2001. "Edith T. Penrose und ihr Einfluss auf die moderne „theory of the firm“," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 221(1), pages 115-120, February.
    15. M H Kunc & J D W Morecroft, 2009. "Resource-based strategies and problem structuring: using resource maps to manage resource systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 191-199, February.
    16. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2004. "To Use or To Sell Technological Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 200405, University of Turin.
    17. Powell, J.P., 2010. "The limits of economic self-interest : The case of open source software," Other publications TiSEM fc6d2aa1-8b29-40be-b888-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Su, Cong & Holm, Ulf & Martín Martín, Oscar, 2024. "Liability of political embeddedness in Chinese multinationals: Implications for headquarters’ roles and reverse knowledge transfer," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
    19. Palmberg, Christopher & Martikainen, Olli, 2004. "The Finnish Telecom Sector Facing Next Generation Standards - Indigenous Capabilities Versus R&D Alliances," Discussion Papers 949, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    20. Ana Célia Castro, 2007. "The CATCHING-UP OF THE BRAZILIAN AGRIFOOD SYSTEM: NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES, INSTITUTIONS AND FIRMS," Anais do XXXV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 35th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 162, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].

    More about this item

    Keywords

    company; competition strategy;

    JEL classification:

    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xvii:y:2017:i:1:p:345-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.