IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxixy2019i1p570-579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Relation between Conservatism and the Amount of Dividends Payable to Shareholders. The Case of Romanian Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia-Cătălina Ciocan

    („Alexandru Ioan Cuza†University of Iasi)

Abstract

This paper has as a main purpose to identify if the use of provisions in accounting is able to produce significant changes in the amount of the distributed earnings (dividends) for the Romanian listed companies. For this purpose, we compute a correction of the distributed earnings by excluding expenses and revenues reported for provisions while maintaining the dividend payout ratio at a constant level. The results indicate significant differences between the dividends actually paid and the potential dividends obtained by excluding the effects of the provisions recognition. We conclude that the use of conservatism in order to avoid decapitalization is a real fact for the company even though the investors seem to be placed in the background. Also, the paper aims to identify and systematise the reasons that should lead the management to recognize provisions in accounting despite the impact exerted over the dividends payable.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia-Cătălina Ciocan, 2019. "Analysis of the Relation between Conservatism and the Amount of Dividends Payable to Shareholders. The Case of Romanian Listed Companies," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 570-579, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xix:y:2019:i:1:p:570-579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/3-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Barker, 2015. "Conservatism, prudence and the IASB's conceptual framework," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 514-538, June.
    2. Sudipta Basu, 2001. "Discussion of On the Asymmetric Recognition of Good and Bad News in France, Germany and the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(9‐10), pages 1333-1349, November.
    3. Sudipta Basu, 2001. "Discussion of On the Asymmetric Recognition of Good and Bad News in France, Germany and the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(9‐10), pages 1333-1349, November.
    4. David Alexander & Simon Archer, 2003. "On economic reality, representational faithfulness and the ‘true and fair override’," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 3-17.
    5. Eric Tracey, 2015. "Discussion of 'Conservatism, prudence and the IASB's conceptual framework' by Richard Barker (2015)," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 539-542, June.
    6. Göx, Robert F. & Wagenhofer, Alfred, 2009. "Optimal impairment rules," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 2-16, October.
    7. Karel Van Hulle, 1997. "The true and fair view override in the European Accounting Directives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 711-720.
    8. Basu, Sudipta, 1997. "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 3-37, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sudipta Basu & Yi Liang, 2019. "Director–Liability–Reduction Laws and Conditional Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 889-917, September.
    2. Khalifa, Mariem & Trabelsi, Samir & Matoussi, Hamadi, 2022. "Leverage, R&D expenditures, and accounting conservatism: Evidence from technology firms," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 285-304.
    3. Inder K. Khurana & Changjiang Wang, 2015. "Debt Maturity Structure and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1-2), pages 167-203, January.
    4. Samira Demaria & Dominique Dufour, 2007. "Choix D'Options Comptables Lors De La Transition Aux Normes Ias/Ifrs," Post-Print halshs-00543071, HAL.
    5. Ivana Raonic & Stuart McLeay & Ioannis Asimakopoulos, 2004. "The Timeliness of Income Recognition by European Companies: An Analysis of Institutional and Market Complexity," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1‐2), pages 115-148, January.
    6. Inder K. Khurana & Wei Wang, 2019. "International Mergers and Acquisitions Laws, the Market for Corporate Control, and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 241-290, March.
    7. Ding, Yuan & Richard, Jacques & Stolowy, Hervé, 2008. "Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries: From stakeholder model to shareholder model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 718-755.
    8. Samira Demaria & Dominique Dufour, 2007. "First time adoption of IFRS, Fair value option, conservatism: Evidences from French listed companies," Post-Print halshs-00266189, HAL.
    9. Stephen Penman, 2016. "Conservatism as a Defining Principle for Accounting," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 6, pages 1-16, December.
    10. Samira Demaria & Dominique Dufour, 2007. "Les choix d'options comptables lors de la transition aux normes IAS/IFRS : quel rôle pour la prudence ?," Post-Print halshs-00266104, HAL.
    11. Wang, Y., 2006. "Essays on the relevance and use of dirty surplus accounting flows in Europe," Other publications TiSEM 6b8751e2-3222-40d8-9fe3-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Akram Khalilov & Beatriz Garcia Osma, 2020. "Accounting conservatism and the profitability of corporate insiders," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 333-364, March.
    13. Ishida, Souhei & Ito, Kunio, 2013. "The Effect of Accounting Conservatism on Corporate Investment Behavior," Working Paper Series 175, Center for Japanese Business Studies (HJBS), Graduate School of Commerce and Management Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Juan Manuel García Lara & Beatriz García Osma & Fernando Penalva, 2009. "The Economic Determinants of Conditional Conservatism," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3‐4), pages 336-372, April.
    15. Hui, Kai Wai & Klasa, Sandy & Yeung, P. Eric, 2012. "Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 115-135.
    16. Moy, Melissa & Heaney, Richard & Tarca, Ann & van Zyl, Warrick, 2020. "Conditional accounting conservatism: Exploring the impact of changes in institutional frameworks in four countries," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    17. Anne Marie Garvey & Laura Parte & Bridget McNally & José Antonio Gonzalo-Angulo, 2021. "True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Juan Manuel Garcia Lara & Araceli Mora, 2004. "Balance sheet versus earnings conservatism in Europe," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 261-292.
    19. Judson Caskey & Volker Laux, 2017. "Corporate Governance, Accounting Conservatism, and Manipulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 424-437, February.
    20. Hongrui Feng & Yuecheng Jia, 2021. "Are CEOs incentivized to shelter good information?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 109-132, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    provisions; conservatism/prudence; dividends; decapitalisation; risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xix:y:2019:i:1:p:570-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.