IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v15y2012i2p219-237..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Biotechnology Startups between Japan and the US

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuyuki MOTOHASHI

Abstract

In this paper, I compare activities in biotech firms in the two countries based on firm-level data in 2004 (443 Japanese firms, 12 of which are listed publicly, and 1,446 US firms, 431 of which are public). First, I found that Japanese firms are much smaller than US firms, even after controlling for firm age and technology field. Furthermore, Japanese firms grow over time, while the size of US firms does not change. These findings suggest that there are some differences in the biotech business models of the two countries. I also found that US firms spend a large amount of R&D particularly in the areas of medical and health, while Japanese firms do not. Therefore, most Japanese firms do not invest a substantial amount of R&D in risky areas but run businesses in low-risk areas, such as providing R&D services. I argue that such differences in startup activities can be explained by differences in the venture capital markets between Japan and the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuyuki MOTOHASHI, 2012. "A Comparative Analysis of Biotechnology Startups between Japan and the US," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 219-237.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:15:y:2012:i:2:p:219-237.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jys007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Honjo, Yuji & Nagaoka, Sadao, 2018. "Initial public offering and financing of biotechnology start-ups: Evidence from Japan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 180-193.
    2. BABA Ryota & MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki, 2013. "Entrepreneurship and Human Capital: Empirical study using a survey of entrepreneurs in Japan," Discussion papers 13049, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Raimund Hasse & Eva Passarge, 2016. "Institutions, Dominant Actors, and Financial Markets: The Case of Venture Capital for Biotechnology in Switzerland," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(06), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:15:y:2012:i:2:p:219-237.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.