IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i3p421-434..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The early emergence of ombuds systems in Japanese science universities

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Brummer
  • Sam Bamkin

Abstract

Ombuds systems in higher education institutes have become increasingly commonplace in North America and Europe, yet there remains a dearth of studies that examine dispute resolution systems in Asia. This article examines the case of Japan, a veritable technology powerhouse that adopted its first organizational ombuds offices in 2019 and 2021 at two leading science universities: Okinawa Institute of Technology and Kyushu Institute of Technology. We assess why these were established, how the change came about, and with what remit the offices are entrusted. We find that policy transfer from abroad occurred in both cases, yet with considerably different degrees of obligation and volitional lesson-drawing, and to considerably different ends. Additionally, policy entrepreneurs played key roles in agenda setting and institutionalization. Nearly all interviewees in this study raised the issue of gender harassment as an enduring challenge for which new conflict resolution mechanisms are needed. The two newly introduced ombuds offices therefore represent one possible model for leveling inequalities in the science landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Brummer & Sam Bamkin, 2024. "The early emergence of ombuds systems in Japanese science universities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 421-434.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:421-434.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Brummer, 2022. "Innovation and Threats," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 563-584, July.
    2. Jon Schmid & Matthew Brummer & Mark Zachary Taylor, 2017. "Innovation and Alliances," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(5), pages 588-616, September.
    3. Sylvia Schwaag Serger & Mats Benner & Li Liu, 2015. "Chinese university governance: Tensions and reforms," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 871-886.
    4. Loet Leydesdorff & Henry Etzkowitz, 1998. "The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 195-203, June.
    5. Alexander Bogner & Wolfgang Menz, 2006. "Science crime. The Korean cloning scandal and the role of ethics," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(8), pages 601-612, October.
    6. Bo Göransson & Rasigan Maharajh & Ulrich Schmoch, 2009. "Introduction: New challenges for universities beyond education and research," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 83-84, March.
    7. Doner, Richard F. & Ritchie, Bryan K. & Slater, Dan, 2005. "Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 327-361, April.
    8. Rose, Richard, 1991. "What is Lesson-Drawing?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 3-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vairo, Daniela & Haring, Anna Maria & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2006. "Policies supporting organic food and farming in the EU: assessment and development by stakeholders in 11 European countries," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10109, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Fuhai Hong & Dong Zhang, 2023. "Bureaucratic beliefs and law enforcement," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 357-379, September.
    3. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2020. "Regional patterns of unrelated technological diversification: the role of academic inventors," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 202001, University of Turin.
    4. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Luengo, María Jesús & Obeso, María, 2013. "Efeito da hélice tríplice em desempenho de inovação," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 53(4), July.
    7. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    8. Francesco Campanella & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta & Stefano Bresciani & Luca Dezi, 2017. "Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 267-284, April.
    9. Xiaojun Hu & Xian Li & Ronald Rousseau, 2021. "Mathematical reflections on Triple Helix calculations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8581-8587, October.
    10. Parsons, Kelly & Lang, Tim & Barling, David, 2021. "London’s food policy: Leveraging the policy sub-system, programme and plan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.
    12. Csenkey, Kristen & Bindel, Nina, 2021. "Post-Quantum Cryptographic Assemblages and the Governance of the Quantum Threat," SocArXiv 3ws6p, Center for Open Science.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. MANUKYAN Izabella, 2022. "To The Question Of The Essence Of Business Clusters: A Literature Review Of Existing Approaches," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 4-9, June.
    15. Osseweijer, Floor J.W. & van den Hurk, Linda B.P. & Teunissen, Erik J.H.M. & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M., 2018. "A comparative review of building integrated photovoltaics ecosystems in selected European countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1027-1040.
    16. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Nathan, Max & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2016. "Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 177-194.
    17. Peter J. May, 1999. "Fostering Policy Learning: A Challenge for Public Administration," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 21-31, June.
    18. Sophie Boutillier, 2019. "Small Entrepreneurship, Knowledge and Social Resources in a Heavy Industrial Territory. The Case of Eco-Innovations in Dunkirk, North of France," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(3), pages 997-1018, September.
    19. Imran Zawwar & Shailesh Munankarmi, 2012. "International Policy Framework The Brand Personality," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 6(1), pages 101-112, December.
    20. Anna Lewczuk, 2021. "Are civil liberties contagious? Analysis of determinants of de facto civil rights protection in post-socialist countries," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 187-217, June.
    21. Fabiano, Gianluca & Marcellusi, Andrea & Favato, Giampiero, 2021. "R versus D, from knowledge creation to value appropriation: Ownership of patents filed by European biotechnology founders," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    22. Godiva Rembeci, 2017. "SME’s Performance Through Comparative Performance Indicators, Measured by Business Statistics- Albania Case," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:421-434.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.