IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v50y2023i4p782-793..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science diplomacy from the Global South: the case of intergovernmental science organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Anna-Lena Rüland
  • Nicolas Rüffin
  • Katharina Cramer
  • Prosper Ngabonziza
  • Manoj Saxena
  • Stefan Skupien

Abstract

Intergovernmental science organizations (IGSOs) address many challenges of the 21st century. Several countries of the Global South have joined established IGSOs or have created new ones. Yet we know little about their interests in IGSOs. Our study addresses this blind spot by investigating which objectives Southern actors pursue in IGSOs and under which conditions they are likely to achieve their objectives. Using insights from three strands of literature, we compare four IGSOs with Southern participation: the European Organization for Nuclear Research, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, the Square Kilometer Array, and the African Lightsource. We show that countries of the Global South pursue a multitude of political and scientific objectives in IGSOs, ranging from capacity-building to casting off political isolation. Moreover, we demonstrate that Southern countries have varying chances of attaining these objectives, depending on their scientific community, domestic politics, industrial capacities and in some cases geographic location as well as an IGSO’s maturity.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna-Lena Rüland & Nicolas Rüffin & Katharina Cramer & Prosper Ngabonziza & Manoj Saxena & Stefan Skupien, 2023. "Science diplomacy from the Global South: the case of intergovernmental science organizations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 782-793.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:4:p:782-793.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parizek, Michal & Stephen, Matthew D., 2021. "The long march through the institutions: Emerging powers and the staffing of international organizations," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 204-223.
    2. Katharina E. Höne & Jovan Kurbalija, 2018. "Accelerating Basic Science in an Intergovernmental Framework: Learning from CERN's Science Diplomacy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 67-72, November.
    3. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Science and scientific collaboration in South Africa: apartheid and after," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 373-390, August.
    4. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Cassidy R Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière, 2019. "Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. David J. Hornsby & Asmita Parshotam, 2018. "Science Diplomacy, Epistemic Communities, and Practice in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 29-34, November.
    6. Aant Elzinga, 2012. "Features of the current science policy regime: Viewed in historical perspective," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 416-428, August.
    7. Cherryl Walker & Davide Chinigò, 2018. "Disassembling the Square Kilometre Array: astronomy and development in South Africa," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1979-1997, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    2. Jyoti Sharma & Danev Ricardo Pérez Valerino & Claudia Natalie Widmaier & Roberta Lima & Nidhi Gupta & Sanjeev Kumar Varshney, 2022. "Science Diplomacy and COVID‐19: Future Perspectives for South–South Cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 294-299, May.
    3. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    4. A. Velez-Estevez & P. García-Sánchez & J. A. Moral-Munoz & M. J. Cobo, 2022. "Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7517-7555, December.
    5. Olof Hallonsten, 2013. "Introducing ‘facilitymetrics’: a first review and analysis of commonly used measures of scientific leadership among synchrotron radiation facilities worldwide," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(2), pages 497-513, August.
    6. Ruonan Cai & Wencan Tian & Rundong Luo & Zhigang Hu, 2024. "The generation mechanism of research leadership in international collaboration based on GERGM: a case from the field of artificial intelligence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(10), pages 5821-5839, October.
    7. Boshoff, Nelius & Ngwenya, Similo & Koch, Susanne & Dudek, Jonathan & Strelnyk, Olena & Costas, Rodrigo & Uisso, Amani J., 2024. "Geographical inequalities in global forest science: A bibliometric perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Richard Heidler & Olof Hallonsten, 2015. "Qualifying the performance evaluation of Big Science beyond productivity, impact and costs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 295-312, July.
    9. Nelson Casimiro Zavale & Patrício Vitorino Langa, 2018. "University-industry linkages’ literature on Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic literature review and bibliometric account," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 1-49, July.
    10. D’Ippolito, Beatrice & Rüling, Charles-Clemens, 2019. "Research collaboration in Large Scale Research Infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1282-1296.
    11. Leila Jabrane, 2022. "Individual excellence funding: effects on research autonomy and the creation of protected spaces," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Tove Faber Frandsen & Rasmus Højbjerg Jacobsen & Jakob Ousager, 2020. "Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1511-1527, August.
    13. Kamilla Kohn Rådberg & Hans Löfsten, 2024. "The entrepreneurial university and development of large-scale research infrastructure: exploring the emerging university function of collaboration and leadership," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 334-366, February.
    14. Frederick Owusu-Nimo & Nelius Boshoff, 2017. "Research collaboration in Ghana: patterns, motives and roles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1099-1121, March.
    15. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Yi Bu & Nicolás Robinson-García & Cassidy R. Sugimoto, 2021. "An empirical review of the different variants of the probabilistic affinity index as applied to scientific collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1775-1795, February.
    16. Nataliya Matveeva & Ivan Sterligov & Andrey Lovakov, 2022. "International scientific collaboration of post-Soviet countries: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1583-1607, March.
    17. Elizabeth S. Vieira, 2023. "The influence of research collaboration on citation impact: the countries in the European Innovation Scoreboard," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3555-3579, June.
    18. Marginson, Simon, 2021. "National modernisation and global science in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Elizabeth S. Vieira, 2022. "International research collaboration in Africa: a bibliometric and thematic analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2747-2772, May.
    20. Wang, Chun-Chieh & Lin, Jia-Tian & Chen, Dar-Zen & Lo, Szu-Chia, 2023. "A New Look at National Diversity of Inventor Teams within Organizations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:4:p:782-793.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.