IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022i2p294-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science Diplomacy and COVID‐19: Future Perspectives for South–South Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Jyoti Sharma
  • Danev Ricardo Pérez Valerino
  • Claudia Natalie Widmaier
  • Roberta Lima
  • Nidhi Gupta
  • Sanjeev Kumar Varshney

Abstract

Apart from economic, political, and cultural cooperation for an equal growth of all developing countries, science and technology are an integral significant component in these levels of engagement for leveraging mutual gains. The current pandemic not only brought about an 1800 shift in the relationship between the government, policy makers, and the scientific community but highlights the importance of South–South Cooperation (SSC). SSC may serve as a mode of cooperation to foster the transfer of need‐based technologies among developing and least developing countries and open many fronts for mutual sharing in terms of geopolitical, available resources, and expertise. The cooperation under the SSC does not substitute but complements North–South development cooperation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The use of science diplomacy would be an effective tool to bring all the stakeholders of the Global South to a common platform to combat future global challenges. Science policy instruments would need to incorporate scope for international collaborations as a means of furthering the national and global imperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyoti Sharma & Danev Ricardo Pérez Valerino & Claudia Natalie Widmaier & Roberta Lima & Nidhi Gupta & Sanjeev Kumar Varshney, 2022. "Science Diplomacy and COVID‐19: Future Perspectives for South–South Cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 294-299, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:294-299
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haibin Niu & Sheng Hong, 2021. "A Chinese Perspective: Will China‐India Friction Paralyze the BRICS?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 524-528, September.
    2. David J. Hornsby & Asmita Parshotam, 2018. "Science Diplomacy, Epistemic Communities, and Practice in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 29-34, November.
    3. H. Elizabeth Thompson, 2018. "Science Diplomacy within Sustainable Development: A SIDS Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S3), pages 45-47, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna-Lena Rüland & Nicolas Rüffin & Katharina Cramer & Prosper Ngabonziza & Manoj Saxena & Stefan Skupien, 2023. "Science diplomacy from the Global South: the case of intergovernmental science organizations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 782-793.
    2. Mihaela Papa & Raj Verma, 2021. "Scenarios for BRICS Evolution in Light of the India–China Conflict," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 539-544, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:294-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.