IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i4p553-560..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic incentive instruments and environmental innovation in China: Moderating effect of marketization
[Incentives for Environmental Self-regulation and Implications for Environmental Performance]

Author

Listed:
  • Siying Long
  • Zhongju Liao

Abstract

As an influential economic entity, China’s economic growth pattern is changing. The traditional way brought high-speed growth as well as caused environmental damage. The concept of environmental innovation, which combines the advantage of technology innovation and environmental consideration, has become a vital means to achieve sustainable development. Due to the double externality characteristic of environmental innovation, the government plays an important role in its development. Based on provincial panel data from 2008 to 2017, this paper first examines the distinct influences of various economic incentive instruments on environmental innovation. Then, the moderation role of marketization is explored. The results show that governments’ direct financial expenditure on environmental protection has a positive impact on environmental innovation, while the effect of the environmental tax is not significant. In addition, the impact is negatively moderated by marketization.

Suggested Citation

  • Siying Long & Zhongju Liao, 2022. "Economic incentive instruments and environmental innovation in China: Moderating effect of marketization [Incentives for Environmental Self-regulation and Implications for Environmental Performance," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 553-560.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:553-560.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donis, Silvia & Gómez, Jaime & Salazar, Idana, 2023. "Economic complexity, property rights and the judicial system as drivers of eco-innovations: An analysis of OECD countries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Qian Zheng & Jinye Li & Xiaole Duan, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Tax and R&D Tax Incentives on Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:553-560.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.