IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i3p440-449..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the human brain: comparing the US and EU Grand Challenges†

Author

Listed:
  • Dolores Modic
  • Maryann P. Feldman

Abstract

The US Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies Grand Challenge and the EU Human Brain Project Future and Emerging Technologies Flagship, though seemingly similar in many dimensions, have distinct features that have been shaped by politics and institutional systems. This article documents the history of the two projects and compares their organization and funding mechanisms. While there is a call for Grand Challenges to motivate science, organizational factors and the mechanisms for allocating funding will have a great influence on the ultimate project outcomes. These two divergent examples suggest alternative strategies to consider when organizing future Grand Challenges, and provide context that should be considered when evaluating the outcomes of large public investments in science.

Suggested Citation

  • Dolores Modic & Maryann P. Feldman, 2017. "Mapping the human brain: comparing the US and EU Grand Challenges†," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 440-449.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:440-449.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scw085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Douglas Fields, 2013. "Neuroscience: Map the other brain," Nature, Nature, vol. 501(7465), pages 25-27, September.
    2. Quirin Schiermeier & Alison Abbott, 2016. "Flagship brain project releases neuro-computing tools," Nature, Nature, vol. 532(7597), pages 18-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher S Hayter & Albert N Link, 2020. "Governance mechanisms enabling inter-organizational adaptation: Lessons from grand challenge R&D programs," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 271-282.
    2. Stephen Brammer & Layla Branicki & Martina Linnenluecke & Tom Smith, 2019. "Grand challenges in management research: Attributes, achievements, and advancement," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 517-533, November.
    3. Sinem Burcu Uğur & Hale Alan & Neslihan Onur & Hüsne Demirel, 2024. "Associations between Grand Challenges and Multinational Enterprises: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:440-449.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.