IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v40y2013i5p657-673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation system in transition: Opportunities for policy learning between China and Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeny A. Klochikhin

Abstract

China and Russia--two giants in the group of emerging markets--continue to attract wide attention as emerging science and technological superpowers. Both countries demonstrate mixed success in innovation development and are struggling to overcome the legacies of the former state planning system and accelerate their transition to effective national innovation systems. This study evaluates the existing path dependencies and compares the achievements of China and Russia. It is suggested that there are a number of policy complementarities and opportunities for mutual learning between the two nations especially in the areas of: university reform, cluster development, and increasing productivity of state-owned enterprises. The case of nanotechnology policies offers an interesting and somewhat contrasting view. Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeny A. Klochikhin, 2013. "Innovation system in transition: Opportunities for policy learning between China and Russia," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(5), pages 657-673, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:657-673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/sct021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Alexander Jaax, 2017. "Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(1), pages 66-88, January.
    2. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Nikolaevich Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2018. "Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2111-2132, September.
    3. Alexandra Tsvetkova & Rhiannon Pugh & Jana Schmutzler, 2019. "Beyond global hubs: Broadening the application of systems approaches," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(8), pages 755-766, December.
    4. Ramani, Shyama V. & Urias, Eduardo, 2018. "When access to drugs meets catch-up: Insights from the use of CL threats to improve access to ARV drugs in Brazil," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1538-1552.
    5. Maria Karaulova & Abdullah Gök & Oliver Shackleton & Philip Shapira, 2016. "Science system path-dependencies and their influences: nanotechnology research in Russia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 645-670, May.
    6. Jinliao He & Yanjiao Song & Xianjin Huang & Jingxia Lin, 2022. "An amenity‐based approach to excellent returning scientists' location choice in China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1181-1197, October.
    7. Zhihui Zhang & Jason E. Rollins & Evangelia Lipitakis, 2018. "China’s emerging centrality in the contemporary international scientific collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1075-1091, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:657-673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.