IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v31y2004i4p254-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A debate on innovation surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Mónica Salazar
  • Adam Holbrook

Abstract

After over a decade of innovation surveys around the globe, it is time to evaluate the process and ask whether or not the Oslo Manual based system of surveys supports the overall objective of providing useful information on innovation. We propose to frame the debate on innovation surveys around the following conceptual and methodological dichotomies: manufacturing vs service sectors; private vs public sectors; high-tech vs low-tech; industrial classification vs clusters; new to the firm vs new to the market; successful vs unsuccessful firms; and, managers vs line innovators. We conclude with some actions that could be taken to overcome some of the problems highlighted. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Mónica Salazar & Adam Holbrook, 2004. "A debate on innovation surveys," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 254-266, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:31:y:2004:i:4:p:254-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154304781779976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Sabatini-Marques, Jamile & da-Costa, Eduardo Moreira & Kamruzzaman, Md & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2019. "Stimulating technological innovation through incentives: Perceptions of Australian and Brazilian firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 403-412.
    2. Ashish Kumar Jha & Indranil Bose, 2021. "Linking Drivers and Outcomes of Innovation in IT Firms: The Role of Partnerships," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1593-1607, December.
    3. Julian Schwierzy & Robert Dehghan & Sebastian Schmidt & Elisa Rodepeter & Andreas Stoemmer & Kaan Uctum & Jan Kinne & David Lenz & Hanna Hottenrott, 2022. "Technology Mapping Using WebAI: The Case of 3D Printing," Papers 2201.01125, arXiv.org.
    4. Mikel Navarro Arancegui & Juan José Gibaja Martíns & Susana Franco Rodríguez & Asier Murciego Alonso, 2012. "Territorial Benchmarking Methodology: The Need to Identify Reference Regions," Chapters, in: Philip Cooke & Mario Davide Parrilli & José Luis Curbelo (ed.), Innovation, Global Change and Territorial Resilience, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Jeroen de Jong & Eric von Hippel, 2008. "User Innovation in SMEs: Incidence and Transfer to Producers," Scales Research Reports H200814, EIM Business and Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:31:y:2004:i:4:p:254-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.