IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v30y2003i2p107-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation and dynamics in public research environments in Denmark: A research-policy perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt
  • Ebbe Krogh Graversen
  • Kamma Langberg

Abstract

The theme for this article is dynamic and innovative research environments and the factors that characterise them. The focus is on the relationship between the organisation and management of research, research processes and environmental conditions on the one hand, and research quality and outcomes on the other. The article takes as a point of departure the results of an empirical study of 15 university and other public-sector research environments in Denmark. It identifies the features that characterise the framework of research, research processes, the working and social milieu of research environments and their influence on research in a smaller European country from a research-policy perspective. Innovative research environments could serve as references for research agents attempting to promote innovation and further develop a dynamic science base. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt & Ebbe Krogh Graversen & Kamma Langberg, 2003. "Innovation and dynamics in public research environments in Denmark: A research-policy perspective," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 107-116, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:30:y:2003:i:2:p:107-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154303781780605
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daphne Ngar-Yin Mah & Peter Hills, 2014. "Collaborative Governance for Technological Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of Wind Energy in Xinjiang, Shanghai, and Guangdong," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(3), pages 509-529, June.
    2. Fernando Jiménez-Sáez & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jose Luis Zofío, 2013. "Who leads research productivity growth? Guidelines for R&D policy-makers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 273-303, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:30:y:2003:i:2:p:107-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.