IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v28y2001i4p267-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing economic performance in the presence of diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Smith

Abstract

International performance comparisons are very attractive to policy-makers, with good reason. In the absence of any practical criteria for judging optimal performance, cross-country comparisons offer one of the few ways in which policy-makers can assess performance outcomes of policy measures and economic processes. This paper explores some dimensions and implications of diversity for inter-country comparisons. There are serious difficulties in formulating hypotheses free of unwarranted assumptions, in interpreting cross-country indicators, and in comparing countries through official statistics. Comparisons can be useful and productive, but need to take heterogeneity into account, using interpretative care to distinguish between real differences and statistical or indicator artefacts. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Smith, 2001. "Comparing economic performance in the presence of diversity," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 267-276, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:4:p:267-276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154301781781417
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xian Gong & Paul X. McCarthy & Marian-Andrei Rizoiu & Paolo Boldi, 2024. "Harmony in the Australian Domain Space," Papers 2404.10006, arXiv.org.
    2. Havas, Attila, 2005. "Terminology and Methodology for Benchmarking Foresight Programmes," MPRA Paper 77791, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Markus Balzat, 2003. "Benchmarking in the Context of National Innovation Systems: Purpose and Pitfalls," Discussion Paper Series 238, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics.
    4. Paasi, Marianne, 2002. "Economics of Collective Benchmarking - Learning in Research and Innovation Policy," Discussion Papers 836, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    5. Markus Balzat, 2002. "The Theoretical Basis and the Empirical Treatment of National Innovation Systems," Discussion Paper Series 232, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics.
    6. John A. Cotsomitis, 2022. "The Learning Economy Regime," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 687-722, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:4:p:267-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.