IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v25y2016i3p339-346..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking the performance of an R&D programme in the biomedical sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
  • Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo
  • Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras

Abstract

This article aims at offering an evaluation framework of an R&D programme in the biomedical sciences. It showcases the Spanish Biomedical Research Networking Centres (CIBER) initiative as an example of the effect of research policy management on performance. For this, it focuses on three specific aspects: its role on the national research output in the biomedical sciences, its effect on promoting translational research through internal collaboration between research groups, and the perception of researchers on the programme as defined by their inclusion of their CIBER centres in the address field. Research output derived from this programme represents around 25% of the country’s publications in the biomedical fields. After analysing a 7-year period, the programme has enhanced collaborations between its members, but they do not seem to be sufficiently strong. 54.5% of the publications mentioned this programme in their address; however, an increase in the share of papers mention is observed 2 years after it was launched. We suggest that by finding the point at which the share of mentions stabilizes may be a good strategy to identify the complete fulfilment of these types of R&D policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Robinson-Garcia & Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, 2016. "Tracking the performance of an R&D programme in the biomedical sciences," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 339-346.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:25:y:2016:i:3:p:339-346.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvw003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos B. Amat & François Perruchas, 2016. "Evolving cohesion metrics of a research network on rare diseases: a longitudinal study over 14 years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 41-56, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hirokuni Mizoguchi & Shingo Kano, 2019. "Comparative analysis of correlations of research and development indicators for rare diseases among Japan, the US, and Europe," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 361-374, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:25:y:2016:i:3:p:339-346.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.