IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v29y2016i12p3519-3544..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Mutual Fund Portfolio Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher G. Schwarz
  • Mark E. Potter

Abstract

We document that CRSP and Thomson contain many voluntarily reported mutual fund portfolios that are not in SEC filings while, additionally, CRSP and Thomson are missing many SEC mandated portfolios available in SEC filings. We document that the voluntary disclosures are likely driven by convenience rather than duplicity. Although mandated portfolios contain securities with more return momentum, we find use of SEC or Thomson data lead to similar empirical findings. CRSP, however, contains inaccurate position information prior to 2008. Our findings have important implications, such as highlighting a 35% increase in observed manager trading by combining data sources.Received March 13, 2014; accepted February 28, 2016 by Editor Laura Starks.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher G. Schwarz & Mark E. Potter, 2016. "Revisiting Mutual Fund Portfolio Disclosure," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(12), pages 3519-3544.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:29:y:2016:i:12:p:3519-3544.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhw057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Yao & Osmer, Eric & Zu, Dingding, 2024. "Timing sentiment with style: Evidence from mutual funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Xiangang Xin & P. Eric Yeung & Zilong Zhang, 2024. "Wrong Kind of Transparency? Mutual Funds’ Higher Reporting Frequency, Window Dressing, and Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 737-781, May.
    3. Hu, Gang & Jo, Koren M. & Wang, Yi Alex & Xie, Jing, 2018. "Institutional trading and Abel Noser data," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 143-167.
    4. Qifei Zhu, 2020. "The Missing New Funds," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1193-1204, March.
    5. Renjie, Rex Wang & Verwijmeren, Patrick & Xia, Shuo, 2022. "Corporate governance benefits of mutual fund cooperation," IWH Discussion Papers 21/2022, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    6. Jun Kyung Auh & Jennie Bai, 2020. "Cross-Asset Information Synergy in Mutual Fund Families," NBER Working Papers 26626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Gormley, Todd A. & Kaplan, Zachary & Verma, Aadhaar, 2022. "More informative disclosures, less informative prices? Portfolio and price formation around quarter-ends," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 665-688.
    8. An, Li & Argyle, Bronson, 2021. "Overselling winners and losers: How mutual fund managers' trading behavior affects asset prices," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Sani, Jalal & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2023. "Spillover effects of mandatory portfolio disclosures on corporate investment," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2).
    10. Li, Li & Huang, Shiyang & Lou, Dong & Shi, Jiahong, 2021. "Why don't most mutual funds short sell?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118854, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Hsiu‐Lang Chen, 2024. "Active mutual funds and their passive ETF investments," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 367-399, June.
    12. Fulkerson, Jon A. & Riley, Timothy B., 2019. "Portfolio concentration and mutual fund performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Yanyu Guo & Zhicheng Zhang & Jizu Li & Huayun Du, 2024. "Research on Identification and Correction of Fund Investment Style Drift Based on FSD Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(5), pages 2605-2640, November.
    14. Martijn Boermans, 2022. "A literature review of securities holdings statistics research and a practitioner’s guide," Working Papers 757, DNB.
    15. Gregory-Allen, Russell & Balli, Hatice Ozer & Thompson, Kathleen, 2019. "The impact of portfolio holdings disclosure on fund returns," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:29:y:2016:i:12:p:3519-3544.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.