IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v19y1997i2p484-491..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Math Competency in Introductory Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Molly Espey

Abstract

In this paper, I examine how a math-competency requirement affects student performance in an introductory economics course. Students were given a basic math-competency quiz at the beginning of the semester. Those who did not pass could receive remedial-math tutoring and retake the competency quiz. The results of this study indicate that students who passed the math-competency quiz, regardless of the number of attempts, performed significantly better in the class than students who did not attain basic math skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Molly Espey, 1997. "Testing Math Competency in Introductory Economics," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 484-491.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:2:p:484-491.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349755
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Espey, Molly, 2013. "Making the Most Out of What You’re Already Doing," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149027, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Kim P. Huynh & David T. Jacho-Chávez & James K. Self, 2015. "The Distributional Efficacy of Collaborative Learning on Student Outcomes," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(2), pages 98-119, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:2:p:484-491.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.