IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v19y1997i2p263-280..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Policy for Agriculture after Commodity Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Luther Tweeten
  • Carl Zalauf

Abstract

The Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act of 1996 opted for the market instead of the government to allocate resources and set returns in agriculture. Decoupled transition payments will continue to year 2002, after which they may be discontinued. A modest safety net of marketing loans and crop insurance may remain after 2002, but the era of government supply management of primary crops appears to be over. In this paper, our objective is to consider appropriate public policy for U.S. agriculture without price-related subsidies and attendant managed supplies. The discussion is suggestive, not exhaustive, and is intended to stimulate thinking on how postcommodity program policy might better serve the needs of agriculture and the public at large.

Suggested Citation

  • Luther Tweeten & Carl Zalauf, 1997. "Public Policy for Agriculture after Commodity Programs," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 263-280.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:2:p:263-280.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349741
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zulauf, Carl R. & Orden, David, 2014. "Assessing the Political Economy of the 2014 U.S. Farm Bill," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197160, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Mitchell, Paul David, 1999. "The theory and practice of green insurance: insurance to encourage the adoption of corn rootworm IPM," ISU General Staff Papers 1999010108000013154, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Zulauf, Carl & Orden, David, 2012. "US Farm Policy and Risk Assistance: The Competing Senate and House Agriculture Committee Bills of July 2012," National Policies, Trade and Sustainable Development 320174, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    4. Wanki Moon & Gabriel Pino, 2018. "Do U.S. citizens support government intervention in agriculture? Implications for the political economy of agricultural protection," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(1), pages 119-129, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:2:p:263-280.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.