IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v14y1992i1p125-137..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Farmer's Choice of Weed Control Method and the Impacts of Policy and Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Kent D. Olson
  • Vernon R. Eidman

Abstract

The importance of risk in a farmer's decision to use herbicides should not be forgotten. This paper presents a theoretical model of the weed control decision and develops a MOTAD programming model. The model uses herbicides at levels of risk aversion found in previous empirical studies. This result was not changed by equal (or even higher) ASCS yields for not using herbicides, a tax on herbicides, or the elimination of deficiency payments. The variability of returns was more important in influencing a farmer to choose herbicides than the higher expected returns in a nonherbicide system.

Suggested Citation

  • Kent D. Olson & Vernon R. Eidman, 1992. "A Farmer's Choice of Weed Control Method and the Impacts of Policy and Risk," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 125-137.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:14:y:1992:i:1:p:125-137.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349613
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jones, Randall E. & Cacho, Oscar J., 2000. "A Dynamic Optimisation Model of Weed Control," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123685, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Roberts, Wayne S. & Swinton, Scott M., 1995. "The Profitability of Sustainable Agriculture on a Representative Grain Farm in the Mid-Atlantic Region, 1981–89: Comment," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 136-137, April.
    3. Dillon, Carl R., 1999. "Production Practice Alternatives For Income And Suitable Field Day Risk Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Gudbrand Lien & J. Hardaker & Marcel Asseldonk & James Richardson, 2011. "Risk programming analysis with imperfect information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 311-323, October.
    5. Simon Akahoua N'cho & Monique Mourits & Jonne Rodenburg & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2019. "Inefficiency of manual weeding in rainfed rice systems affected by parasitic weeds," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 151-163, March.
    6. Oriade, Caleb Adewale, 1995. "A bioeconomic analysis of site-specific management and delayed planting strategies for weed control," Faculty and Alumni Dissertations 307890, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. Swinton, Scott M. & Clark, David S., 1994. "Farm-Level Evaluation of Alternative Policy Approaches to Reduce Nitrate Leaching from Midwest Agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 66-74, April.
    8. Westra, John V. & Olson, Kent D., 2001. "Enviro-Economic Analysis Of Phosphorus Nonpoint Pollution," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20653, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Dillon, Carl R. & Shearer, Scott A. & Mueller, Thomas, 2001. "A Mixed Integer, Nonlinear Programming Model Of Innovative Variable Rate Planting Date With Polymer Seed Coatings," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20572, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:14:y:1992:i:1:p:125-137.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.