IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v34y1967i3p295-299..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Optimal Transfer and Income Distribution in a Growing Economy

Author

Listed:
  • K. Hamada

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Hamada, 1967. "On the Optimal Transfer and Income Distribution in a Growing Economy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 295-299.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:34:y:1967:i:3:p:295-299.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2296677
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. M. Hawtrey, 1995. "Fiscal Settings and the Steady State Growth Path," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(4), pages 354-366, December.
    2. repec:wvu:wpaper:11-05 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Chou, Chien-Fu & Talmain, Gabriel, 1996. "Redistribution and Growth: Pareto Improvements," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 505-523, December.
    4. Andrew T. Young & Hernando Zuleta, 2016. "Golden Rules of Wages," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 253-270, July.
    5. Iwasa, Kazumichi & Zhao, Laixun, 2020. "Inequality and catching-up under decreasing marginal impatience," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 99-110.
    6. Kim Hawtrey, 1990. "Dynamic Behaviour of a Unionized Solow‐Swan Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 66(2), pages 81-92, June.
    7. Kazumichi Iwasa & Laixun Zhao, 2013. "Inequalities and Patience for Tomorrow," Discussion Paper Series DP2013-04, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    8. Jeffrey Petchey, 1995. "Resource Rents, Cost Differences and Fiscal Equalization," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(4), pages 343-353, December.
    9. Lansing, Kevin J., 1999. "Optimal redistributive capital taxation in a neoclassical growth model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 423-453, September.
    10. Gerhard Sorger, 1996. "Efficient Income Redistribution in a Growing Economy," CIRANO Working Papers 96s-29, CIRANO.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:34:y:1967:i:3:p:295-299.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.