IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v27y1960i3p206-209..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Equivalence of the Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories and the New Stock-Flow Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cliff L. Lloyd

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Cliff L. Lloyd, 1960. "The Equivalence of the Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories and the New Stock-Flow Analysis," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 27(3), pages 206-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:27:y:1960:i:3:p:206-209.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2296083
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Romain Plassard, "undated". "The origins, development, and fate of Clower’s ‘stock-flow’ general-equilibrium program," Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series 2016-16, Center for the History of Political Economy.
    2. Leland Yeager & Alan Rabin, 1997. "Monetary aspects of Walras's law and the stock-flow problem," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 25(1), pages 18-36, March.
    3. Nadler, Mark Alan, 1983. "An analysis of some of the issues raised in the liquidity-preference loanable funds interest rate controversy," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800009946, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:27:y:1960:i:3:p:206-209.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.